psoham777
New member
K android is great in updates lol
Yes great because you can easily get the update by rooting your phone. Lol
K android is great in updates lol
Again. Everyone keeps bringing in Samsung devices as if they we're representative of all of Android.
Use a stock Android device, it flies. And beats Windows Phone in performance for quite a few things as well.
Hey android requires specs to run it without problem.I here talk only about mid range nd low end.I don't know about 4gb phones.Yes, even I Samsung sells most android phones, it doesn't matter, right? What would you say the performance of other companies who come up with android, are they any better?
rumour has it that itll be better optimised than windows 8/8.1,wp8.1,windows RT
fingers crossed
Hey android requires specs to run it without problem.I here talk only about mid range nd low end.I don't know about 4gb phones.
May be within 2 years every android will sport 6000 mah battery nd 8gb ram lol.
I never said that updates are great on Android, but they aren't as bad as people make them out to be.K android is great in updates lol
Yes, in everything android is better right? Even if more than 70% people don't get update on their Android phones, still they come up with a vague reason like this, that android users are more than WP. Well Chevrolet users are more than Ferrari, that means Chevrolet is a lot better than Ferrari, WOW
Yes and Windows Phone will catch up to that, within an year or two.May be within 2 years every android will sport 6000 mah battery nd 8gb ram lol.
Yes great because you can easily get the update by rooting your phone. Lol
Lollipop is fascinating. Runs pretty well on the Nexus 4 I have, and overall I like the appearance. But it's not actually *that* great.
The Nexus 6 reviews are so bad in the display, camera and battery departments. And that is why I don't prefer Android. I thought all the ART and Volta stuff was supposed to remedy the horrible battery life but a Note 4 running on KitKat is still better in just about everything, despite Samsung's crap software on top. So I agree with the OP, Lollipop isn't actually *that* big a deal.
Try comparing a Material Design application like Play Newsstand to a Metro UI application like Bing News.I dont see improvements other than UI
lollipop is most certainly a downgrade so far for me
windows phone is rather consistent in comparison and so is ios
android L has some major issues to tackle
Actually that's quite mistaken. While the reviews of the Nexus 9 are a bit disappointing, the Nexus 6 has received a lot of praise from the majority of reviewers. Including the arguably biased Verge.
I consider AnandTech's reviews to be the most in-depth and unbiased that I've come across.
AnandTech | The Nexus 6 Review
Check out the terrible display calibration and lacklustre brightness (the 930 has a much brighter AMOLED), the average battery life (1520 destroys it in that department, even the N5 has better battery scores), and yes, OIS has greatly helped the Android photography space but let's not kid ourselves into thinking that Nexus cameras are that great. Xperia Z3 and most Lumias make far better pictures. Wasn't Lollipop supposed to bring camera improvements? I don't see if that changed at all.
Don't get me wrong, like I said, Lollipop is most certainly a step-up from KitKat was. The design choices look nice and if they stick with it (and don't drop it like they did with Holo), it has lots of room from improvement. Even if running in native code (ART) isn't giving huge battery gains, it's still much smoother than Dalvik, and that I can appreciate. But I still stand by the fact that Note 4 obliterates the N6 in almost all areas of practical use (besides the looks, the N6 is GORGEOUS).
If I am not wrong the thread intended to discuss Android 5.0 and device comparisons less, but I'll still answer your queries.
The Nexus 6 is more expensive than other Nexus devices, but it still nearly $200 cheaper than most high end Note devices or even the high end Lumia series, if certain cuts we're made in the display and camera and they don't matter much to people then so be it.
Lollipop wasn't a magical solution to improving camera performance, that's not how things work really but Lollipop did introduce a totally refined camera API, which has allowed people to do this:
http://www.androidauthority.com/nexus-5-lollipop-camera-api-samples-540858/
Not everyone will benefit from the photography improvements, but those that do know their way around these will definitely benefit.
As far as battery life goes, the Lumia 1520 has the ability to stuff a huge battery into a less powerful package than the Nexus 6. The Nexus 6 has too power a much more powerful CPU, GPU, RAM and not to mention that highly pixel dense display. So the fact that the Nexus 6 lasts a day or longer is pretty impressive.
And going onwards Project Volta wasn't a silver bullet either, it will help devs optimise their apps better but that will take time.
I wasn't aware of that, different places different prices.32gb Nexus 6- $649 from Google
32gb Lumia 1520- $585 from Microsoft
I wasn't aware of that, different places different prices.
But I'm pretty sure Microsoft/Nokia are shaving off prices just to get it to sell.
My point was that this isn't the Nexus of old, this is priced as a premium device. I can get a comparable Android phone, the LG G3, for roughly 600$.