I've heard a lot of controversy surrounding the newly announced Surface Laptop, and I'd like an opportunity to discuss these controversies and opinions with the Windows Central community.
I'm of the opinion that the Surface Laptop marks a departure for Microsoft from what the Surface line was made for: category creation and boundary setting. But I don't necessarily believe that this marks the end of those category defining products. People have been clamoring for years for Microsoft to create a true traditional clamshell laptop that can compete against the likes of Apple and their Macbooks. Yet now that it's come, and now that it's absolutely beautiful, well-designed, and powerful, all we can seem to talk about is the flaws and the drawbacks. The price, the lack of USB Type-C, or the 4GB of RAM in the starter model, these are all I've heard talk about around here.
And I have to wonder why that is. Why are people so hesitant to accept the Surface Laptop, which bridges an obvious gap between the Pro 4 and the Book almost perfectly? Why are people so reluctant to admit that the Surface Laptop isn't going to revolutionize the PC market any time soon, but it's still an incredibly designed laptop that can help set some standards for other PC OEM's to go above and beyond? I mean, if we're being honest with ourselves, the Book is the first "true" Surface since the original Surface Pro, considering the Pro 2, 3, and 4 all feature the same 2-in-1 design. Yet no one complains that Microsoft keeps updating the Pro line without reinventing the wheel once again.
I own a Pro 4 and I believe it's an incredible device. It's beautiful and perfect for my needs. And given the chance. I would happily use the Surface Laptop as well. I can see a place for both in my life. I can understand why Microsoft would design and release such a device. And I can also understand why those of us here, at Windows Central, would be amongst the few so hesitant to accept it. I want to discuss exactly why that is.
I'm of the opinion that the Surface Laptop marks a departure for Microsoft from what the Surface line was made for: category creation and boundary setting. But I don't necessarily believe that this marks the end of those category defining products. People have been clamoring for years for Microsoft to create a true traditional clamshell laptop that can compete against the likes of Apple and their Macbooks. Yet now that it's come, and now that it's absolutely beautiful, well-designed, and powerful, all we can seem to talk about is the flaws and the drawbacks. The price, the lack of USB Type-C, or the 4GB of RAM in the starter model, these are all I've heard talk about around here.
And I have to wonder why that is. Why are people so hesitant to accept the Surface Laptop, which bridges an obvious gap between the Pro 4 and the Book almost perfectly? Why are people so reluctant to admit that the Surface Laptop isn't going to revolutionize the PC market any time soon, but it's still an incredibly designed laptop that can help set some standards for other PC OEM's to go above and beyond? I mean, if we're being honest with ourselves, the Book is the first "true" Surface since the original Surface Pro, considering the Pro 2, 3, and 4 all feature the same 2-in-1 design. Yet no one complains that Microsoft keeps updating the Pro line without reinventing the wheel once again.
I own a Pro 4 and I believe it's an incredible device. It's beautiful and perfect for my needs. And given the chance. I would happily use the Surface Laptop as well. I can see a place for both in my life. I can understand why Microsoft would design and release such a device. And I can also understand why those of us here, at Windows Central, would be amongst the few so hesitant to accept it. I want to discuss exactly why that is.