- May 16, 2013
- 279
- 0
- 0
These tablets are going for 299. Other than screen size, what other advantage would there be to go with the surface 2 (its still a rt).
Battery life is a big plus for Surface 2. No matter what others say, Intel can't create a low power processor that can beat ARM processors for power saving.
You do realize that the MacBook air with haswell gets a quite similar battery life normalized for battery size as the iPad? Bay trail is significantly less power hungry...
You do realize that the MacBook air with haswell gets a quite similar battery life normalized for battery size as the iPad? Bay trail is significantly less power hungry...
Not sure about full Windows on an Atom. I am afraid that it will be slow and I already have a good desktop anyway.
I understand and agree with your concerns. Just keep in mind that the Surface 2 is not going to be any faster than a Bay Trail. Both will be very slow compared to a Core i5 desktop. This does not mean that they are useful machines. The iPad is just as "limited" in horsepower, yet people do a lot of stuff on those devices, too.
I have to say that playing around with the Surface RT in stores, I've found that it seemed to perform well enough with light tasks (e.g. Office, web browsing, etch) as long as you had iPad-like expectations for speed. Yes, the Surface 2 and Bay Trail tablets will be faster than the first gen Surface RT, but don't expect desktop (or laptop!) type performance.
I think the key is to have the right expectations.
Actually, no, the Surface 2 does NOT come with full Office 2013 suite. It comes with Office 2013 RT, which is basically equivalent to the Office 2013 Home & Student that comes with the 8" Bay Trail based tablets. And since the 8" tablets are running on Intel, that copy of Office is actually fully featured (e.g. the RT version cannot run macros or addins), and the copy on the Intel platform can be upgraded to the next versions of Office when they are released.
I own a Surface Pro and really like the idea of the Surface 2, but I really wish that MS had put a Bay Trail chip in Surface 2 - that would make this device a no brainer. And don't tell me that MS couldn't have put Bay Trail in the Surface 2 chassis - if Asus can put it in the T100 for $350 (including a hardware keyboard!), MS could have done it in Surface 2.
The Surface 2 sure seems to benchmark better according to the Anandtech reviews. I wonder if that will apply to real life performance? Either way I am really happy with my Surface 2.
Correct on macros and VBA, but Office 2013 RT has Outlook which is hugely important if you use Exchange or Office 365.
One of the reasons I suspect is that Surface 2 with RT is a different concept, more appliance-like. If you could install x86 desktop applications it would be just another Windows device, more vulnerable to malware, and more likely to get broken by some wretched 3rd-party toolbar or rubbish like that. I am sure you are clued up enough to know how to manage Windows but the majority are not, from what I see. Windows RT puts all that behind you.
Tim