- Jan 6, 2014
- 1,809
- 0
- 0
Superbowl ads are costing $9 million per minute this year. Should Microsoft spend that to get some positive public perception?
Consider the video "Microsoft HoloLens: Transform your world with holograms."
The video runs just over two minutes and has 11.6 million views since it was posted on YouTube six days ago. They could run that one during the Superbowl for a paltry $20 million (or less if they cut out a few less interesting bits). It has the "wow" factor and I think large numbers of people would be like "What the... the game can wait. Let me rewind and watch that again!"
It doesn't advertise a currently shipping product, instead it shows how Microsoft has much more of a consistent vision of the future of computing than Apple, Samsung, or any of those other guys. It would have the potential to get people talking about Microsoft in a more positive way than we've seen in a long time.
What say you all?
Consider the video "Microsoft HoloLens: Transform your world with holograms."
The video runs just over two minutes and has 11.6 million views since it was posted on YouTube six days ago. They could run that one during the Superbowl for a paltry $20 million (or less if they cut out a few less interesting bits). It has the "wow" factor and I think large numbers of people would be like "What the... the game can wait. Let me rewind and watch that again!"
It doesn't advertise a currently shipping product, instead it shows how Microsoft has much more of a consistent vision of the future of computing than Apple, Samsung, or any of those other guys. It would have the potential to get people talking about Microsoft in a more positive way than we've seen in a long time.
What say you all?