That's actually true. lolMy money's on the majority poking fun at how its 10 instead of 9.
Please, fill us in, what's the obvious?Seems like a but of a bone-headed naming choice and every rationalization I've heard so far has been silly. Microsoft says 'trust us, it will make sense later' or 'it makes sense because this is going to be the last major release of Windows', but honestly those arguments don't hold much water for me. I get not wanting to call it Windows 9, especially since that version number will likely be meaningless in a few years... But how does going one bigger make that any different? It just adds a layer of stupidity to the whole thing.
Really all we can do at times like this is put our heads down and say "Oh, Microsoft..."
They try, they just overthink everything and end up missing what should be obvious
Pretty shallow my brother.I'm not referring to anything specific, just a general pattern. It seems for everything Microsoft gets right there must also be something silly they botch. Sometimes it's awkward naming conventions, sometimes it's bad communication (for a recent example, look back to the blog post explaining the recent changes to Office 365 for business), and sometimes it's just something nonsensical like calling this version of Windows version 10 just because it's a nice, round number.
Don't misunderstand, I don't dislike Microsoft as a company or anything like that. I just find their ineptitude at everything that is not developing software to be... charming.
I wouldn't discount #3, I am guilty of writing that code in an enterprise application...