Wow... Ballmer's Farewell Message...

squire777

New member
Feb 21, 2012
1,345
0
0
Visit site
There was an article in Forbes not too long ago suggesting that certain aggressive shareholders (ValueAct) were part of the reason why Ballmer left.

Just goes to show again that investors are getting too much influence on companies and why stock markets are driving companies to only care about profit.
 

tgp

New member
Dec 1, 2012
4,519
0
0
Visit site
Just goes to show again that investors are getting too much influence on companies and why stock markets are driving companies to only care about profit.

Not to nitpick, but isn't profit the point of any business? But I see what you're saying, "to only care about profit."
 

Fade_z

New member
Jun 15, 2013
425
0
0
Visit site
Not to nitpick, but isn't profit the point of any business? But I see what you're saying, "to only care about profit."

Purely business speaking yes, but then we would be stuck with no innovation/improvement because they only care about products sold.

If you love your job you want the best product possible
 

tgp

New member
Dec 1, 2012
4,519
0
0
Visit site
Purely business speaking yes, but then we would be stuck with no innovation/improvement because they only care about products sold.

If you love your job you want the best product possible

Innovation is a necessary part of a tech business for profit. That's why they have an R&D budget.
 

Cleavitt76

New member
Jan 10, 2013
360
0
0
Visit site
Innovation is a necessary part of a tech business for profit. That's why they have an R&D budget.

I think the point that he is trying to make is that investors tend to be very short sighted and most of them don't really care about the company at all. They just want to get in, make some quick cash, sell their stock, and then probably use the money to buy the stock of a competitor. Publically traded companies are under constant pressure to maximize short term profit even if it means that the company will suffer in the long term strategy. If the investors are too stupid or greedy to understand why a company is spending so much on R&D this quarter in order to release future products it can be almost impossible for the company to justify those moves to investors. The investors just see it as inefficiency. Of course if they don't make moves, a few quarters down the road those same investors will turn around and say that the company is stagnant and should have invested more in R&D.

There are lots of examples of this. It's not uncommon for a large publically traded company to release an earnings report showing X billion dollars of profit and then lay off thousands of workers because investors were expecting X+1 billion dollars profit.

A more specific and recent example of this was Microsoft's 900 million dollar write down for Surface RT. MS is trying to break into an established market which is an extremely difficult undertaking with a lot of risk. To anyone that has some common sense and a clue about technology it's probably not a surprise that it may take a lot of money and a few attempts to be successful. Yet shortly after the Surface RT write down a bunch of class action lawsuits were filed against Microsoft by investors that apparently felt that ever single thing that MS does has to be successful on the first attempt. It doesn't matter that MS made 5 billion dollars of profit that same quarter.

Thankfully MS is still attempting to upgrade products, innovate, research, and plan for the future despite the average wall street investment firm i.d.i.o.t pushing for more safe boring business ideas like "fire some people to reduce costs." I can only imagine how frustrating it would be for someone like Steve Ballmer to have to explain something as complex as Microsoft's vision for all of their different products and ecosystem to a bunch of boring glorified accountants and technology illiterate rich old dudes.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
323,089
Messages
2,243,229
Members
428,021
Latest member
khstnxht