Thanks again, WPC, for killing the LG saddlebags, but there's more work to be done...
I haven't had much time for internet browsing on my PC lately, but when the opportunity arises, I gravitate to the WPC site (forum reading/posting is easier with a real keyboard)... Frustrated by how slooow my browser is when I visit the WPC site, I did a little experiment. I closed the browser (IE11 Modern) and cleared the cache. I reopened in Bing (my default homepage) and visited several news sites and blogs using the trending menu. Basically, I just randomly went to several websites using only a single browser window. By the time I was at the last site, my RAM usage was 60.x MB.
I repeated the task, closing the browser, clearing the cache, and using a link to WPC's homepage that I have on my start screen, I came directly here. I opened an article, used the link to come over to forums, and opened a post. Again, I used only a single browser window. With a single WPC page loaded in the browser, my RAM usage was 333.x MB!!!
I frequently get hit with long-running script notifications and wait 5-10 seconds for a single WPC webpage to load. My tested internet d/l speed is approximately 12 mbps and I'm using Windows 8.1 on my vintage 2009 Dell with 4 GB RAM. I do have Do Not Track, pop-up and 3rd-party cookie blockers, and other security set on my browser, but I've added WPC to the whitelist. Only AT&T rivals you guys for a slow-to-load website.
I understand needing to monetize the site, but perhaps you should look at the CTR on ads. Unless your arrangement with advertisers is PPV instead of PPC, they aren't paying for the resulting bad performance of the WPC website and they are costing you users. Were it not for the awesome content provided by Rubino and company, you could close it down.
I haven't had much time for internet browsing on my PC lately, but when the opportunity arises, I gravitate to the WPC site (forum reading/posting is easier with a real keyboard)... Frustrated by how slooow my browser is when I visit the WPC site, I did a little experiment. I closed the browser (IE11 Modern) and cleared the cache. I reopened in Bing (my default homepage) and visited several news sites and blogs using the trending menu. Basically, I just randomly went to several websites using only a single browser window. By the time I was at the last site, my RAM usage was 60.x MB.
I repeated the task, closing the browser, clearing the cache, and using a link to WPC's homepage that I have on my start screen, I came directly here. I opened an article, used the link to come over to forums, and opened a post. Again, I used only a single browser window. With a single WPC page loaded in the browser, my RAM usage was 333.x MB!!!
I frequently get hit with long-running script notifications and wait 5-10 seconds for a single WPC webpage to load. My tested internet d/l speed is approximately 12 mbps and I'm using Windows 8.1 on my vintage 2009 Dell with 4 GB RAM. I do have Do Not Track, pop-up and 3rd-party cookie blockers, and other security set on my browser, but I've added WPC to the whitelist. Only AT&T rivals you guys for a slow-to-load website.
I understand needing to monetize the site, but perhaps you should look at the CTR on ads. Unless your arrangement with advertisers is PPV instead of PPC, they aren't paying for the resulting bad performance of the WPC website and they are costing you users. Were it not for the awesome content provided by Rubino and company, you could close it down.