I sure hope so! I'm sick of drooling over all of the phones that AT&T is getting while I'm stuck with VZW.Until Elop says "Here is the Lumia 900" nothing is 100% IMO
Also, does anyone else think that it not being announced at AT&T's conference, only hinted at, may mean that AT&T doesn't have exclusivity?
Until Elop says "Here is the Lumia 900" nothing is 100% IMO
Also, does anyone else think that it not being announced at AT&T's conference, only hinted at, may mean that AT&T doesn't have exclusivity?
It may also simply mean that AT&T is not ready to launch the phone.
Dam its going to ATT no T-mobile, and Nokia is ****ing up by not trying to have all carriers carry it..I hope Nokia fails
I seriously doubt not putting a high end phone on T-Mobile will harm Nokia. TMo is hemorrhaging high paying customers and is focusing on unsubsidized phone sales and prepaid plans. There is a reason they put the 900 on AT&T and the 710 on T-Mobile. HTC and Samsung are the only manufacturers releasing quality, high end hardware on tmo, and that is only for Android.
Dam its going to ATT no T-mobile, and Nokia is ****ing up by not trying to have all carriers carry it..I hope Nokia fails
I have a feeling this was a decision that was more about AT&T than Nokia. If AT&T said, "We'll carry it, but it has to be exclusive. And in return, we'll make it a Hero phone." What is Nokia supposed to say? "No. We want to put it on T-Mobile."? lol