Mitlov
New member
They truly believe that PureView is a technology that stands on its own. It's not a device. It's not a phone.
The demo was for a feature of PureView. And the phone would happen to include that technology. But the phone isnt the technology.
The ad ended with "THIS IS LUMIA." Even if we try to claim that the professional cameras they were using (which probably weren't Nokia products) were "Pureview technology"--and I think that's a real stretch--they just can't get around that conclusory statement.
Winterfang said:I'm not the only one saying, if the camera was that great why fake it?
This is what I can't get around. If you'll forgive the political comparison, it's like Paul Ryan claiming he ran a marathon in 2:50 (he actually ran it in 4:10). Running a marathon in 4:10 is impressive enough; there's no need to embellish or mislead. So why do it?! Likewise, from the limited third-party tests of the Lumia 920 so far (including Brighthand, an Android-centric smartphone page), its camera is class-leading...so why snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with an ad so offensively misleading that even non-tech-sites like the Huffington Post is covering it?
Someone needs to get fired over that ad. Seriously.