Personally I am tired of seing all those "revolutionary" improvements in performance, but not much improvements in terms of battery life.
So my vote goes to Better batteries.
So my vote goes to Better batteries.
Last edited:
True, neither my Titan II, MacBook Pro or iPad 2 can last all day with frequent usage... I think it should be a priority.I think the world as a whole not just in smart phones needs a battery revolution.
Quality front cameraI would also like to see stuff we were getting used to as standard just before the smartphone revolution but then got dropped...I know some of this is coming back but it's crazy it was dropped in the first place, manufacturers producing top phone such as Nokia were really chucking as many things in as they could...
Quality front camera
Latest bluetooth
Wireless FM transmitter
Stereo speakers built in - seriously why have we gone back to mono?
Hotswappable microsd
True, neither my Titan II, MacBook Pro or iPad 2 can last all day with frequent usage... I think it should be a priority.
Well they did a fairly good job to shorten the time it takes to get full charge, I guess a battery is possible before the end of this decade.I agree with everyone else here, although I'm skeptical we will see battery life improving anytime soon. The reason being that we tell the manufacturers what we want with our purchasing dollars, and given the choice between a device with a battery life of 72 hours (which is what I would like) and a device with a much better CPU/GPU, I'm pretty certain most would purchase the later. Unfortunately, we don't have the tech to get both.
I use 75% to 100% of my battery during the day, some say I am addicted to my phone, but hey internet, Facebook, twitter, WPcentral, and many more apps to fill the empty spaces of the day can drain your battery very fast.You know... I know I don't speak for everyone, but I already know that performance, specs, etc are going to improve over time, so really, battery life is what matters to me. I do just fine as-is, but it'd be great to go a whole day on 20% charge instead of the 40-50% I use today.
None of the above.
What I want is a mid-range WP smartphone with a sub-$300 "all-in" price. As in, the price to buy outright.
Sell it for $299 on EVERY carrier under the sun. The Big Four, MetroPCS, Cricket, US Cellular, you name 'em.
It would be the Commodore 64 of smartphones -- the first mobile smart device "for the masses, not the classes." It wouldn't require pricing games with "$199 up front plus a two-year contract on an inflated price plan with an eye-watering ETF."
Just pay for the phone, choose your service provider, and go.
As I understand it (I don't live in the U.S.), the main reason U.S. residents buy their phones through carriers is because U.S. carriers don't have compatible networks. You can't just buy a phone and choose any carrier you like. However, every carrier world wide is currently transitioning to LTE. LTE is poised to become the worlds first global phone radio standard. Won't this totally change how U.S. residents buy phones, as the whole compatibility issue goes away? Isn't it likely that U.S. residents would also start seeing discounted prices for customers who bring their own device? Or is there more to it that I don't understand?
Too bad many US providers don't have discounted prices for data plans if you bring your own device...so you end up paying $100 more over the course of two years than you would with a "$200-with-the-plan" flagship phone.
And even for people who offer prepaid plans instead of contract plans, there's often a catch. US Cellular's coverage maps are not nearly as good for prepaid customers as they are for contract customers.
If the carriers played ball, that would be great...but that's a big "if."
US carriers have and will make sure that they can their devices incompatible on the same frequency