What would be an acceptible price for you, $400 maybe $500? I may get it if it's at $400.
8x has this beat what is Nokia doing?
$400 for an 822 versus $500 for an 8X... hmmm. I would have to play around with both first. I'll need to take video and pictures, in addition to comparing screens, and decide which would be better.I'd probably spend $400 on it, but the 822 would be a tough sell if the 8X were within $100 with regards to full retail price. It would be nice if WP8 devices came in at a lower cost than the iPhone and high-end Android devices do.
Actually, what kinda bums me out for the Verizon customer base is that if you put spec VS spec of this and the 8X, neither is a runaway winner (I am assuming this is similar to the 820. Still to be announced goodies in this to be seen). I still believe a Flagship Nokia will come to Big Red, but that doesn't help the potential WP customer base now.
It is a mid range device! The HTC 8x will be VZN's upper tier device!
The 8X is a high-mid range device, the 822 is a high-low end device. If you want to get technical. Since the 8X is not on the same league as the Note II/ OneX+.
It almost looks like the HTC Trophy with that bottom lip thingy. This is THE ugliest Lumia. The 810 is much nicer looking. I think this thing got hit with the ugly stick!LOL, nice improvement, Gaichuke.
It's still not the prettiest handset... reminds me of the LG Quantum.
Well I'm just not really buying that this will be a 820 knockoff. The screen on that phone got leaked ages ago. There was the "phi", "arrow", and now "atlas". So that's why I think it's a different phone
I still can't get over how fugly and cheap this phone looks. Who in their right mind would purchase this?