The headline of the article is pretty nonsensical, IMO. Here is the logic that the article is giving me:
1. HTC arguably makes the best Android device.
2. HTC is doing a copy-paste of the hardware from (1.), putting Windows Phone on the "paste" end.
3. HTC is making the best Windows Phone.
The logic there is seriously flawed for a few reasons:
1. Nokia/Microsoft puts more effort into good hardware than Samsung (whose phone bodies and cameras suck).
2. HTC got the "Window Phone" flagship moniker with the 8X, as opposed to the 920, but they offered little software support and skipped the 2013 launch altogether.
Basically, HTC half-asses its Windows Phone efforts, while Nokia/Microsoft works harder with Windows Phone hardware than Samsung does with its Android devices. So, deciding that the HTC hardware trumps Nokia hardware because it arguably trumps Samsung is just bad logic. At the end of the day, I don't trust HTC to put real work into this phone, making it just a semi-required copy-paste to say they're in the WP market. The metal of the body's likely to be the only selling point, while Microsoft will push legitimate features like a better camera, more storage, super-sensitive touch, and vastly-superior firmware/software support.