fierywater
New member
Citation needed.What is worth having a high end device when not properly coded for the specifications of a carrier?
Citation needed.Ask Verizon how does it really feel about having three undercoded and underencrypted devices, which is why no other CDMA carrier will touch WP8 anytime soon, starting with Sprint and US Cellular.
You haven't cited a single source for anything you've said and my searching has come up with nothing. I can't find a single mention of anything you've brought up as the reasons for Sprint and the others not carrying WP8.Brmiller, you really need to bring a valid argument to each point i have countered and still have not brought any sense to the discussion. Sorry, but FACTS are overwhelming.
Citation needed. No one has said anything about the support (or lack thereof) that CDMA devices have received from Microsoft, and the available evidence points to Microsoft's support being just fine (namely, timely software updates). Don't you think there would at least have been rumors leaked about things like that?Sprint nor any carrier using CDMA 2000 technology who has decided to sit for the WP8 launch will keep their stand in regards in forcing Microsoft code properly and give the same exact technical and marketing support they give to AT&T and T Mobile.
And...citation needed. Again, I can't even find any rumors mentioning MetroPCS and Nokia together. Also, who exactly is Lumia? Nokia, you mean?Oh, by the way, MetroPCS did made a request for enough Lumia 900 devices, but Lumia REFUSED because they would not build CDMA 2000 based devices with US carrier specification (the same goes to all their line of WP7 devices).
If you could provide a single reliable source for your information, people here would likely take you more seriously. You can't sit here and accuse people of failing to bring sense to the discussion when you haven't showed us anything to back up your so-called facts. As it stands, you sound like a rambling Sprint/CDMA ****** spouting conspiracy theories.