I've been reading a lot of conjecture lately that while Hololens is impressive, Microsoft has already been "bested" by https://www.metavision.com/
Apparently, their headset has a much wider field of view and is much more immersive.
The downside of the Meta glasses is that they're not untethered but needs a PC - but their device is only $950.
However, it frustrates me that Microsoft could potentially already be "late to the party" AGAIN if it turns out the Meta glasses result in a better overall experience due to the FOV.
Thoughts?
Apparently, their headset has a much wider field of view and is much more immersive.
The downside of the Meta glasses is that they're not untethered but needs a PC - but their device is only $950.
However, it frustrates me that Microsoft could potentially already be "late to the party" AGAIN if it turns out the Meta glasses result in a better overall experience due to the FOV.
Thoughts?