Then explain to my why no CDMA carrier outside of Verizon decided to join the launch of WP8, besides the FACT WP8 did not have the proper and required Qualcomm CDMA code, and no carrier will touch China Mobile CDMA coded devices in the US (and perhaps everywhere outside of China).
That person who will rename nameless has been bashing Sprint without presenting any facts, especially knowing the FCC ordered Mcrosoft to become Qualcomm compliant two years ago, which meant NO CDMA devices for the second generation of WP7 devices (and before you mention Huawei and US Cellular, that device was a first generation device with 7.5 Mango installed) for any US carrier. Can you blame that on Sprint as well? If you do, you need to revise your strategy to try to change my mind as well as others who support Sprint or any non participating CDMA carrier.
Your argument is very flawed! Try another strategy because it will not change my stand as well as others here in regards to the "stepchild" treatment Microsoft has given CDMA carriers in the US, even though CDMA is the dominant cell technology last time I checked.
Enough of the off topic discussion. I think it's time the 8XT is reviewed, and most of the wpcentral community would like to see one from one of the writers.