It's because the consumers don't want it. They still have a bitter taste in their mouths from their own experience on windows mobile or word of mouth experience from windows mobile.Great article. Tech sites seem to love WP7. Makes me wonder why certain carriers don't want customers to experience Windows Phones.
I purposely didn't say offer free windows phone because carriers have done that and people have not wanted to sell for those devices.
If that's true, then expect a lot more sales coming... offering what Android manufacturers have to pay them per handset! Haaa.Microsoft are supposed to be starting to offer carrier sales reps a $10-$15 incentive for selling WP handsets, so they are improving at least
WTH. Three years ago, the last time Windows Mobile had any level of significance, less than half of current smartphone users owned smartphones. And of those that did, maybe 10% owned WinMo phones. That's about 5% of the current market. Sound familiar. If every single WinMo owner "never" touched a Windows Phone, it would be little more than a blip in the charts. Btw, I am a long time former WinMo user who has followed the platform for 10 years. The Widows brand has nothing to do with it. Greedy reps waiting for spiffs. Now that they got them, watch things change. You buy phones, but most people are "sold" phones.It's because the consumers don't want it. They still have a bitter taste in their mouths from their own experience on windows mobile or word of mouth experience from windows mobile.
Carriers could take initiative and give incentives to employees to sell Microsoft devices or maybe Microsoft could do that... offering free Xbox 360 consoles for top sellers of Windows phone. Or even PCs/Laptops/Slates for top sellers.
WTH. Three years ago, the last time Windows Mobile had any level of significance, less than half of current smartphone users owned smartphones. And of those that did, maybe 10% owned WinMo phones. That's about 5% of the current market. Sound familiar. If every single WinMo owner "never" touched a Windows Phone, it would be little more than a blip in the charts. Btw, I am a long time former WinMo user who has followed the platform for 10 years. The Widows brand has nothing to do with it. Greedy reps waiting for spiffs. Now that they got them, watch things change. You buy phones, but most people are "sold" phones.
Sent from my HTC Surround using Board Express
Exactly why I stated "word of mouth experience from windows mobile" as well. For every bad experience, one person will likely tell at least 10 others.WTH. Three years ago, the last time Windows Mobile had any level of significance, less than half of current smartphone users owned smartphones. And of those that did, maybe 10% owned WinMo phones. That's about 5% of the current market. Sound familiar. If every single WinMo owner "never" touched a Windows Phone, it would be little more than a blip in the charts. Btw, I am a long time former WinMo user who has followed the platform for 10 years. The Widows brand has nothing to do with it. Greedy reps waiting for spiffs. Now that they got them, watch things change. You buy phones, but most people are "sold" phones.
Sent from my HTC Surround using Board Express
Exactly why I stated "word of mouth experience from windows mobile" as well. For every bad experience, one person will likely tell at least 10 others.
I agree 200% (if that's possible). Before the iPhone it was mainly business users and extreme geeks that cared about smartphones. I remember the Treo and stuff, maybe at one point Palm made a WM device, I think? Anyway, I don't know who started this whole "WM left a bad taste in people's mouth" theory. Even word-of-mouth, can you imagine a smartphone owner before 2007 telling a flip phone owner: "Man, don't get Windows Mobile, it sucks!" That flip phone guy would be like "Huh? Those phones are too expensive. Why would I do with one anyway?"I agree that dissatisfied customers tend to share their displeasure far and wide but.. other than via online forums like these I have NEVER heard any feedback (either positive OR negative) regarding the old windows mobile O/S. And this is despite being a relatively techy type myself and knowing/hanging out with/working with a fair number of tech and business types (essentially the sort of ppl who were the WM customer base) so I'm sure I know/knew more than a few WM users but... oddly enough... none of them ever felt the need to share their cellular unhappiness experiences with me (though we have certainly discussed plenty of other topics across a very wide range so, why not this one?).
My personal suspicion is that WM negative connotations are being way over-credited in the matter of the low/slow acceptance rate that WP has been seeing. It's more just a combination of weak marketing, limited selection, and store reps pushing Android and iOS over WP because it's what they "know". The WM effect is minimal at best.