So, I see a lot of comments and articles on tech blogs criticizing the metro UI, even from knowledgeable tech writers. Microsoft apparently adopted the UI as early as 1995 and really started to push when the Zune players and software were released at the end of 2006. Everyone knows how it is now the default WP UI and it is coming to W8.
But, I'm seeing the influence of the UI everywhere these days. When Google revamped its services last year, I was surprised to see how much it took from it. If anyone's reading Time magazine, they'll have noticed how they borrow the shape and colors principles of Metro in many of their charts, and the list goes on (ads, websites...)
What I'm getting at is that on one side, the Metro UI has really not been received well, and on the other it seems it's starting to look like its principles and aesthetics are getting borrowed from a lot of companies (even competitors). I don't understand how both can coexist (not counting fanboyism).
Has anyone noticed something similar?
But, I'm seeing the influence of the UI everywhere these days. When Google revamped its services last year, I was surprised to see how much it took from it. If anyone's reading Time magazine, they'll have noticed how they borrow the shape and colors principles of Metro in many of their charts, and the list goes on (ads, websites...)
What I'm getting at is that on one side, the Metro UI has really not been received well, and on the other it seems it's starting to look like its principles and aesthetics are getting borrowed from a lot of companies (even competitors). I don't understand how both can coexist (not counting fanboyism).
Has anyone noticed something similar?