I am old enough to remember the original PC wars (when I was in elementary and middle school) in the 1980s. As far as magazines were concerned, there was only one player -- Apple -- and one other, IBM.
Meanwhile, Commodore was selling more 64s than the rest of the industry was selling computers, combined. They were almost completely ignored by the "professional press," and even today, a history of personal computing glosses over the best-selling personal computer of all time. Robert X. Cringlely claimed to not know anything about Commodore other than "it was a stock scam."
A "stock scam" that proved that personal computers could be powerful AND accessible to the "masses, not the classes" as Jack Tramiel put it. It laid the groundwork for Microsoft Windows and the PC revolution that put a PC on every desktop.
You have to understand that the tech press is VERY elitist. They live in San Francisco and NYC, and are convinced that those are the only two places that matter. Expensive stuff is great, cost is no object -- in fact, if you are a middle-class person who wants performance and buys an Android, you're scorned at. (One article on a top tech blog claimed that "Android phones are for the unbanked" [eg people who cannot afford banking services]).
It's an elitist row. Even after WP has 25% or more of the market, it will STILL be belittled and ignored by the same elitists who write tech articles that put the Macintosh half of the article first and give it as much space as the Windows part, even though the Mac is a tiny niche machine with around 10% of total US share (and under 4% globally). We just have to accept that the tech press is not an accurate mirror of our society. Don't look to it for insight on the "real world."
Most people use Windows. Lots of people still use BlackBerry (and want another one). And more people use Windows Phone now than used iPods back when the tech press was breathlessly extolling the virtues of "Apple's digital music revolution."
(And for the record, I live in one of the two cities the tech press swarms in and know a lot of the writers personally, so I can doubly vouch for their myopia. One of these days, I will tell all of you about one well-known columnist's insistence that Excel was "overrated" and that spreadsheet users just couldn't wait to switch to Apple's "Numbers" in its iWork package).