Here's why the 920's camera takes such terrible daylight/landscape shots:
- Two factors are involved, none of which are the aperture, that I believe significantly contribute to having less detail than people wish.
1. Sensor size. It is tiny. Very tiny. It has to capture 8 million pixels. Up close, that translates to a very crisp, "sharp" shot. Far away, that doesn't. Test this out with your own eyes. Look at the text of anything written very small up close. It looks good. Now, stand back and look at it and it loses detail very quickly.
2. Jpeg compression/noise reduction. Every picture taken from any single digital camera is shot RAW. In camera, some fine tuning is almost always used to create jpegs (or TIFF's). This reduces the file size, inherently adds noise and attempts at cleaning up some of that noise. The level at which the Lumia does it is quite high.
Aperature being wide open is not the entire reason these pictures aren't sharp as a tack.- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
a5cent likes this.02-18-2013 09:52 AMLike 1 - Share
- You're all looking at post processing... But the real reason is if you keep looking at the display as it focuses. You will see the camera try to auto focus, you'll see it go from blurry to sharp, and then to blurry, and never go back to the sharpest looking picture. If you hold down the button halfway you will see this time and time again. You have to be VERY picky about what you're focusing on, most of the time I have to focus on a completely different object, and then pan back to where I want to take the picture. Even still, this does not work. It never seems to grab the perfect focal point. Granted, even those rare times, in a close up shot, when it looks sharp in the display, when the picture is taken it still looks kind of blurry. However, looking at pictures I took yesterday, I'm noticing a LOT of noise in these pictures... I was using all default settings. It almost looks like a high ISO photo. I think that in general, the shutter is open for too long, or the AUTO ISO value is too high, and then they darken it with the post processing, which is not my point at the time. My point is it doesnt focus worth crap. I'll attach some images for comparison. The first one here took me about eight different attempts at focusing on something other than the center of the image. The second is just a touch of the screen image capture. The noise is VERY noticable though. None have been edited.
02-18-2013 10:53 AMLike 0 - http://nokiashots.tumblr.com/
Check out these Nokia shots. If you don't have portico update unfortunately your picture quality will not be up to par.02-18-2013 11:09 AMLike 0 - Interesting posts. At the end of the day, my L920 takes poor pictures. Always blurry and focus not sharp. This was a poor upgrade from an N8.
- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
Napocensis likes this.02-18-2013 11:20 AMLike 1 - Share
- Well, I have seen a case that a cam of Lumia 920 was bad (1st pic, on left side) ... and after Nokia repaired it, it was just great (3rd pic, on right side)
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=ac953...A02sV0bicIsrMc
P.S. it is not my pic, I just bring it here for this thread ...- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
ttsoldier likes this.02-18-2013 12:04 PMLike 1 - Share
- Nokia UK Photography - What's your PureView?
Check out these Nokia shots. If you don't have portico update unfortunately your picture quality will not be up to par.02-18-2013 12:08 PMLike 0 - Two factors are involved, none of which are the aperture, that I believe significantly contribute to having less detail than people wish.
1. Sensor size. It is tiny. Very tiny. It has to capture 8 million pixels. Up close, that translates to a very crisp, "sharp" shot. Far away, that doesn't. Test this out with your own eyes. Look at the text of anything written very small up close. It looks good. Now, stand back and look at it and it loses detail very quickly.
2. Jpeg compression/noise reduction. Every picture taken from any single digital camera is shot RAW. In camera, some fine tuning is almost always used to create jpegs (or TIFF's). This reduces the file size, inherently adds noise and attempts at cleaning up some of that noise. The level at which the Lumia does it is quite high.
Aperature being wide open is not the entire reason these pictures aren't sharp as a tack.
Can't expect anything exciting from 1.4 micron pixels.. just look at the new xperia Z, its shooting at 13Mpix for .. well.. marketing purposes, but its using 1.1 micron pixels.. so.. instead of improving the quality, its pretty much the same or worse:
Camera comparison: Sony Xperia Z vs Samsung Galaxy S III, Galaxy Note II, iPhone 5, Nokia Lumia 920
But most people think.. oh.. 13Mpix is more than 8Mpix, it should be much better! No. That is not how it goes. Just compare a 12Mpix pic from the Nokia N8 which shoots with 1.75 microns, and you will see the difference.
Also, the jpeg processing in the 920 is.. very tricky because of the low light performance. I've said this before, if they can't figure out a way to switch between night mode and day mode automatically, they should give the user a way to switch between the two.
On the previous page I showed couple of shots from my Phase 1 phone.. wide open at F2.4 ... there is more detail then you will ever need. So aperture is not a problem if you have a good sensor, proper optics, and the required jpeg processing.- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
palandri likes this.02-18-2013 02:36 PMLike 1 - Share
- There's a comparative review of smartphone cameras in Gizmodo today. They try to identify the best by considering performance under various conditions, and only pick the very best smartphones for the comparison. The Lumia 920 came out as the best performing. Interestingly, sailing in the face of the title for this thread, the Lumia won the round for best daylight pictures.
The Best Smartphone Camera
I don't really understand what point the OP was trying to make with the title to this thread. Perhaps they are comparing smartphone cameras to highend SLRs. It would be more accurate and helpful to general readers for the thread title to be changed to '... why smartphone cameras take such terrible pictures'. I don't think they do take terrible pictures, and it has been a long time since I would describe any picture I've taken with a smartphone in those terms.02-18-2013 02:43 PMLike 0 - Perhaps the OP can clarify for me why the phone in my DSLR is crap.
- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
02-18-2013 03:32 PMLike 6 - Share
- Totally wrong my friend! Especially when you pretend not to be a noob, you should get your facts straight. First, there's no lens on a smartphone with an adjustable aperture...all are fixed. Nokia decided to go with the widest one (f2 ), which of course has the most naturally occuring lens blur. But their decision was justified by other user scenarios : macro photography and low light. As you mentioned, somewhat on the surface of the topic only, shallow depth of field gives you incredible close-up shots, also in lowlight it simply let's more light in without excessive and noisy ISO settings or shutter speeds. So of course there's some tradeoff - there aren't sharp AND wide lenses even in the DSLR space let alone ones that can be mounted on a smartphone. And still that tradeoff in my opinion is not that radical. Landscape photos after update are up there with other smartphones. Andyes, why so snobby when clearly you know close to nothing after asking if the aperture can be adjusted...02-18-2013 03:50 PMLike 0
- Well, I have seen a case that a cam of Lumia 920 was bad (1st pic, on left side) ... and after Nokia repaired it, it was just great (3rd pic, on right side)
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=ac953...A02sV0bicIsrMc
P.S. it is not my pic, I just bring it here for this thread ...02-18-2013 04:00 PMLike 0 - They forgot the N8 and the 808 ..
Yes, and so does the Samsung Pixon12. I think Nokia figured out that using a mechanical ND filter does the job just fine, instead of going with a much more complex arrangement required for variable aperture. Both the N8 and the 808 use similar ND filter system, the 808 uses a ND8 filter ( Neutral density filter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) which is basically a 3 stop reduction..
Hopefully once they properly port phase 1 to the Lumia range it will have it as well.
Here is how it works on the N8
02-18-2013 04:20 PMLike 0 -
- for gods sake...its a MOBILE PHONE...with a camera. its not a Canon 5D Mark III (amazing piece of kit btw) it IS the best camera on a smartphone aside from the nokia beast which was a camera first and a phone attached to it!
Your never ever ever EVER going to get results comparable to a DSLR, not even close...its PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE so worship it for what it is, the best camera on a smartphone today. Want something better? get a real camera.- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
Jazmac likes this.02-18-2013 06:32 PMLike 1 - Share
- for gods sake...its a MOBILE PHONE...with a camera. its not a Canon 5D Mark III (amazing piece of kit btw) it IS the best camera on a smartphone aside from the nokia beast which was a camera first and a phone attached to it!
Your never ever ever EVER going to get results comparable to a DSLR, not even close...its PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE so worship it for what it is, the best camera on a smartphone today. Want something better? get a real camera.
https://skydrive.live.com/pagenotfounderror
So are we talking D400 with a 2000 dollar lens, or a Canon XTi from couple of years ago with a 400 dollar lens ? Both are.. DSLRs. And I am not saying that a phone can replace a DSLR for a professional, but for an amateur ? Absolutely.
and no... the 808 is smartphone with an amazing camera as a bonus.02-18-2013 07:24 PMLike 0 -
- There's a comparative review of smartphone cameras in Gizmodo today. They try to identify the best by considering performance under various conditions, and only pick the very best smartphones for the comparison. The Lumia 920 came out as the best performing. Interestingly, sailing in the face of the title for this thread, the Lumia won the round for best daylight pictures.
The Best Smartphone Camera
I mean, the 808 eats the other Phones for breakfest, I have a friend With a GS3 and I have the lumia 920, both Phones are top of class known for great cameras - it's not even a fight. the 5mp shots from the 808 destorys them. makes the GS3 look foolish in all light. But the lumia can compete in low light, where handheld - it wins(ois ftw). but tripod mounted, the 808 still can't be beat (mecanical(long) shutter(speeds) ftw).02-18-2013 09:15 PMLike 0 - but how serious can you take those guys when they dont even have the 808 in there =P?
I mean, the 808 eats the other Phones for breakfest, I have a friend With a GS3 and I have the lumia 920, both Phones are top of class known for great cameras - it's not even a fight. the 5mp shots from the 808 destorys them. makes the GS3 look foolish in all light. But the lumia can compete in low light, where handheld - it wins(ois ftw). but tripod mounted, the 808 still can't be beat (mecanical(long) shutter(speeds) ftw).02-18-2013 09:36 PMLike 0 -
An informative post does not excuse acting like a tool- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
02-18-2013 10:34 PMLike 3 - Share
-
but my point still stands, how serious can you take the artical? I mean you compare the s3 to the one x. and conclude the one x is better (I also read the test), but and I quote "HTC's flagships come with rubbish cameras. So we didn't bother with those this time around."(- the gizmodo artical), so Obviously, they dont agree (and as I said, how serious can you take these guys?) as the S3 is in there.
so I would say it's a bitt of a stretch to say the S3 isn't on par With the others =)02-18-2013 10:48 PMLike 0 - Yes, and a great acheivement from them, but still form factor is unacceptable for a modern smartphone. It's going to be "software photography" all the way for smartphones. Let's wait and see where nokia takes it next.02-19-2013 01:35 AMLike 0
- In spite of your vast photography and camera knowledge and / or experience, you got the 920 for 2 years anyway. Awesome.
- Share
- Share this post on
Digg
Del.icio.us
Technorati
Twitter
920Walker likes this.02-19-2013 01:51 AMLike 1 - Share
- Forum
- Phones
- Windows Phones
Here's why the 920's camera takes such terrible daylight/landscape shots:
Similar Threads
-
So Why the 920?
By Andrew Z in forum Windows PhonesReplies: 18Last Post: 01-07-2013, 10:23 AM -
Comparing the Lumia 920 camera to the Pureview 808 camera
By jmajid in forum Windows PhonesReplies: 2Last Post: 11-01-2012, 03:58 PM -
Why the Lumia 920 wasn't displayed in Cyan
By baileystein in forum Windows PhonesReplies: 4Last Post: 09-22-2012, 02:19 PM -
So lets hear your reasons why the Samsung Ativ, etc are better than the 920
By theefman in forum Other Operating SystemsReplies: 30Last Post: 09-06-2012, 12:00 AM -
why the photo that take from samsung i917's camera have not any GPS information?
By bakerwhy in forum Windows Central ArchiveReplies: 0Last Post: 02-22-2011, 04:38 AM
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD