Really At&t?

[inteller]

here is what I don't get. The 920 was a $449 contract free phone (Amazon), 32GB and wireless charging. I don't give a **** about the bigger screen this neutered ATT 1520 better be $399 TOPS off contract.

 

[psudotechzealot]

You're welcome for the caring. Please come to me with any issues in the future my friend.

Thanks, and I will take that into consideration, buddy.

 

[alv3st3r]

AT&T Nokia Lumia 1520 will not have Qi because AT&T supports rival PMA | WMPoweruser

 

[inteller]

ATT picked the losing side! P&G/Duracell can't buy their way into a "standard"

 

[Reflexx]

What the hell AT&T? How about letting the consumer decide which standard to adopt?

 

[inteller]

fact is Duracell was/is about to have their *** handed to them by Qi as they were the ONLY ones pushing their proprietary powermat crap with the iphone sleeves. Rather than just suck it up, sell off their remaining inventory and adopt Qi, they decided to go to the standards whores known as IEEE and partner with them to push this PMA crap. IEEE has lost all respect in my eyes as a neutral entity.

 

[Kevin Spring]

here is what I don't get. The 920 was a $449 contract free phone (Amazon), 32GB and wireless charging. I don't give a **** about the bigger screen this neutered ATT 1520 better be $399 TOPS off contract.

It's $749

 

[inteller]

this device has officially flopped then.