RichHowerton
New member
I also have an icon, and am interested in the ATIV SE mainly for the SD card, expandable storage, a 64 gb card can hold a lot of videos, and music. have not switched yet......
I doubt that seriously. Not dissing the ativ, but indo remember a similar backorder for Nokia at one point with att and it was really just because they didn't ship many models.The Ativ SE is on backorder apparently. Along with the galaxy S5. So I'm wondering does the Ativ SE acutally has that much demand or is did samsung only ship 5 Ativ's and the demand is for 8 lol? Is it because of the BOGO? Or is it because of Cortana's publicity lately? So which could one of these theories seem like the most likely scenario? Good to see a windows phone on back order.
I'm sure you must feel pretty good about yourself now that some random rep randomly agreed with all of your points.
Pack it up everyone, thread over, we officially have a winner...:winktongue:
I also have an icon, and am interested in the ATIV SE mainly for the SD card, expandable storage, a 64 gb card can hold a lot of videos, and music. have not switched yet......
How are y'all seriously arguing each other down about which product feels more quality when its based on personal experience?? Smh
Sent from my all seeing 1020
Exactly, that's something Nokia just don't get. That people might want a high end phone with expandable storage AND a removable battery.
I rarely ever keep a phone longer than 6 months...my 1520 being the first phone I have had 6 months.
Much like Samsung feels the need the need to use their plastic despite many people wanting them to do something, for whatever reason the same can be said about Nokia and their choice of not using batteries that are removable and SD card.
1520 is that old already? Time flies man.
And since it's about that time, how much you selling the 1520 for?
What does Nokia build their phones out of? Plastic.
I think they should stop using it.
I finally played with the Ativ Se today. And in typical fashion, the store I went didn't have the Internet settings configured correctly. All in all, I like it. It is a very good alternative to the Icon. Personally, the plastic that looks like aluminum look is much better than the S4. If you've used an Ativ S before, this is more of an under the hood upgrade.
Personally, I'd take this on t-mo anytime. Good looking phone indeed. Can't go wrong with either phone.
Posted via Princely Purple Z Ultra
MSFTisMIA... how did the screen compare to the Icon? How did it feel in hand? The phone looks nice with the brushed aluminum, and I wouldn't mind a little lighter weight compared to the Icon. I like the fact memory is expandable as well as the battery replacement. I'm trying to hunt down a store near me that has one. The Corporate store closest to me doesn't have it yet of course.
Also, what do all of you think of Edge? Its basically a phone lease program? Is it worth it if you like to upgrade once a year? I usually buy outright and just sell the device on eBay once Im done with it. Wonder if this is less hassle and not much of a cost difference overall.
Another quick question MSFTisMIA, did you get a chance to play with the camera. One of the things holding me back slightly is the camera vs the Icon. I have a Lumia 822 now and the camera leaves much to be desired. Ive heard the ATIV SE has the same camera as in the Galaxy S4 and Note 3, which is said not to be too bad at all, in in some cases people liked it over the Icon's.
Im going to a store to test today, but wondering if anyone else has had a chance to try it.
Actually the specs are the same as the ICON!. I just received my ATIV SE and also have the Icon. I have been comparing the two closely and the ATIV SE wins in more ways than the Icon. Better battery life with the ATIV SE and also a removable battery (uses the S4 battery and external charging case), the ATIV display is brighter and whites are better than the Icon (pink hue for whites) also better viewing angles on the Samsung. Since the ATIV has the same battery area pins as the S4 I can convert it to wireless charging easily and also be able to swap out the batteries whenever I need some more juice without having to find an outlet. The ATIV has a microSD slot to expand the storage (I was already using up most of my Icon storage capability). Call quality is equally good on both devices and the ATIV actually sounded better through my Ford Microsoft Sync Nav system than the Icon. The ATIV is thinner and fits the hand better than the Icon IMO. Signal strength is the same on both as is WiFi connectivity. The speaker is loud and clear on the ATIV, speakerphone works equally well on both. The camera is the same one that is in the S4, but still is no slouch compared to the Icon. The Icon wins on build quality, camera and having built in wireless charging but that is it. I will take the better display, removable battery, microSD slot and hard Windows button that turns on the phone over the few wins for the Icon. Most Nokia apps are or will be available to other Windows Phone devices in the future so no real win for the Icon on the software front. If you don't need the best display, are always close to an outlet and don't need more than 32GB of storage and want the 20MP camera go with the Icon. If not at least take a look at the ATIV SE, you might be pleasantly surprised.The Icon is the better phone. Don't forget the Samsung's specs are basically the same as the GS4 which came out a year ago.
Since the ATIV has the same battery area pins as the S4 I can convert it to wireless charging easily