falconeight
New member
Microsoft should have stayed with evolving the Nokia 800. Instead the phones kept getting bigger and fatter. The 800 could have grown incremental and lost weight.
I don't remember exactly how it was stated in the video, but assuming thatuxguy's quote is correct, you've got to admit that specifying required RAM capacity to be a function of bit'ness is at least very suspicious.
Being generous, I'd say the statement is too vague to mean anything. If you want to be strict about it, it's just downright wrong.
I was actually asking about the claim that the video is an 'Android advert'. You're right. Indeed, moving to a 64 bit processor doesn't increase the RAM requirements (much). You might want a 64 bit processor if you have more than 4GB of RAM or are dealing with very large files (unlikely on a smartphone today), although even then it's not necessary in all cases. Not sure why it's 'suspicious', though - what suspicions does it raise, other than that the reviewers don't have a deep understanding of all the technical details? To the best of my knowledge, there are no 64 bit Android phones today - I'm happy to be corrected if that's not true - so it's hardly promoting Android.
Well, you're not leaving us much choice but to guess what you're asking about, are you? After all, your question was just: "please explain your last comment". Anyway, my point is that whatever you were asking about, the statement itself makes little to no sense, which we apparently all agree on.
Maybe it was an Android advert, I don't know. If it was, it was pretty bad, as it probably didn't make a single person in the world want to go out and buy an Android device. I suspect that if confronted, not even the reviewers themselves would be sure about the point they were trying to make with that sentence.
As to your question in regards to what is suspicious, well, you just answered that yourself. :wink:
Pattern lock is probably the worst security measure ever.To be fair, that review wasn't "terrible" and I think sums up what a lot of outsiders feel about the WP platform in general.
Most people on this forums are used to WP missing features/apps/doing things differently but not someone who's used to an android phone.
I've been toying with a Moto G the last few days and there's been quite a few times I've felt, "hey wow, I wish my 820 did that". They weren't any groundbreaking features, but really tiny things like pattern unlock, night mode and so on.
WP8.1 seems awesome to us WPers, but if you look at it objectively, is just playing catch-up to what Android has had for years - pull down notifications, orientation lock, separated volume and so on. There's still quite a bit missing.
Also, like it or not, the fact remains that the 930 is year old tech. How do you expect people to compare it with say an S5 or G3 and sing praises in favour of it?
My iPad Mini (already sold) was just 1 month old when iOS 7.0.3 was out and jammed the entire settings app.It really is sad how pervasive Android and iPhone fanboys are in the industry. They're at every level. My boss and a few of our programmers went for sales force training and they told me one of the presenters went out of his way to trash WP. Like an out of left field trashing, and his gripe was that "their updates break it". I wish I was joking but that was his actual reasoning behind trashing the platform. That's the part that really annoys me. The majority of them have never even used a Windows Phone and if they have they picked one up, looked at it and put it down. It's always evident in their comments. They range from shortsighted, to stupid, to outright untrue.
Pattern lock is probably the worst security measure ever.
Pattern lock is probably the worst security measure ever.
For sure, the quality wont be there, but it's spec talk that the lazy review sites will tout repeatedly even without having one to test. One thing I absolutely hate about review channels is the vs features they make on products without even having used it! It's purely down to speculation of how the device will perform based on it's internals. Trouble is, this gets the average consumer excited and in to making rash purchases on pre-orders.
CPW must hate me by now, as I always exercise my 14day right on distance selling with handsets. I use the phone for a few days, decide if it works for me or not, if not I return it. SIimple! I make my own choice's, I don't rely on reviews!
How?
Can you break pattern lock easily?
I think bio metric is worst security measures
Just take a look at the fingerprints on your screen.We've been down this road before:
Each time someone points out a missing feature or missing app in WP, the first defence I see is usually a:
"Ah, but that's a stupid feature to have..."
"You don't really need that feature/app..."
"We don't have that app, but the unofficial alternate we have is better..."
Search through the forums, how many times has the same been said about the notifications bar or the ability to search through text messages? Now that 8.1 finally has these years after android, we expect the world to suddenly fall in love with WP and give it rave reviews?
And for the record, pattern lock is NOT the worst security measure ever...technically face unlock is probably more insecure. But I actually prefer it when at home because it means by 3 year old can't get to my phone (she memories patterns and PINs pretty fast).
My point is, a missing feature is a missing feature whether it's useful for you or not!
Obvious. The fingerprints on the screen.
Obvious. The fingerprints on the screen.
Sorry, But I don't understand what you mean.
So, no matter what security features you are talking about, Android already have that one plus more.
It's users choice what they prefer pattern, face lock, security code etc.Blame them.
my dad just took back the icon after 1 day. The reason being the apps. Unlike my brother who two years later can't name the app he wanted and they don't have, my dad had answers lol. He was looking for QuickBooks, PNC, and his local bank. Being a small business owner these are very important and a must so he went back to his iPhone. Which really sucks because had nothing but praise for the phone and OS.
Funny, my dad just switched from his Lumia 920 to a Nexus 5 also because of the apps (including the one for his local bank