DNG with Lumia 950: Rich Capture vs raw

valuxin

New member
Jan 30, 2013
38
0
0
Visit site
Hey there!

Lumia 950 have a superb camera, however, build-in processing algorithm overdo, as for me, with sharpening and noise reduction. So the DNG way is obvious. When taking photo with Rich Capture phone creates 2-3 DNG per shot, while without this option there is only one DNG per shot. So that's why I'm here to ask you to share your experiences and opinions on when and where Rich Capture is preferred to use and may get better result in post-processing.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:

valuxin

New member
Jan 30, 2013
38
0
0
Visit site
@Blacklizted
Thank you for videos - quite interesting:) I'm also doing DNG+JPG shoots, because DNG are more flexible to edit and have better quality. JPGs are too juicy, over-sharpened with funny 72ppi. Here is the comparison between JPG and slightly adjusted DNG converted to JPG:
http://1drv.ms/1OItfhx

But overall the question was about the worth of using Rich Capture (RC) with DNG. In low light environments RC creates DNGs that could have not the same quality as DNG without RC have.
 

Blacklizted

New member
Oct 26, 2013
88
0
0
Visit site
@Blacklizted
Thank you for videos - quite interesting:) I'm also doing DNG+JPG shoots, because DNG are more flexible to edit and have better quality. JPGs are too juicy, over-sharpened with funny 72ppi. Here is the comparison between JPG and slightly adjusted DNG converted to JPG:
http://1drv.ms/1OItfhx

But overall the question was about the worth of using Rich Capture (RC) with DNG. In low light environments RC creates DNGs that could have not the same quality as DNG without RC have.

I agree. Sometimes rich capture doesn't kick in.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
323,183
Messages
2,243,405
Members
428,037
Latest member
Brilliantick99