- 09-23-2013, 04:48 PM #1
- 09-23-2013, 04:55 PM #2
There a long way from that. Don't think there will not be one hell of a fight. This is no Dell deal. Even though BB is not doing well this deal grossly undervalues them. You don't think its more than mere coincidence BB pre-released those horrible numbers on Friday and a buyout offer coming the very next business day.
I think this bid is nothing but bait to lure some other buyers out. However this goes I cannot see the company getting a majority shareholder vote to let them go private.
- 09-23-2013, 06:09 PM #4
There is nothing but heartache for Microsoft if they acquire BB. There is nothing BB has that MS needs, plus you get a very entitled and committed (to the BB platform) user base. Anything you do that doesn't involve advancing the BB platform will get you vitriol.
- 09-23-2013, 06:37 PM #5
dkediger is right. MSFT buying BB is a bad idea. They have nothing MSFT needs.
There's only one upside play to BB and that is they have no debt and 2.5 to 3 B in cash plus a bunch IP's of really unknown value. I think the best move for shareholders is to start selling the company off in parts while cash-cowing the remaining BB 7 userbase. Stop all production on BB10 and the related devices.
09-23-2013, 08:27 PM #6
- 341 Posts
- 0 Post(s)
- 0 Thread(s)
It's a shame, because BB10 is really a great OS (although I prefer WP).
I was really hoping for something like a Sony-BB partnership. My main problem with BB10 is the hardware design and the terrible camera tech. BB10 running on Sony hardware would be tempting, because not only would it look good, but would have some decent camera technology as well. I'd have a hard time leaving WP even for that though. :p
I see little benefit for MS to buy BB. There is no way that Microsoft would want to run two operating systems (unless to use BB10 strictly as an enterprise solution, and offer QNX for automotive). There is no way that MS would discard WP for BB10 in the consumer market for countless reasons, among which would include losing the "3 screens" plan, as you wouldn't be easily developing applications to run on both the Win8 kernel and QNX kernel.
I hope that harm towards BB employees is minimal, and that Heins doesn't escape with $50 million while 40% or more of hard working employees lose their source of income.
- 09-23-2013, 11:15 PM #8
- 09-24-2013, 08:59 AM #9
- 09-24-2013, 10:01 AM #10
Yeah - I don't think their IP is terribly valuable anymore from a strategic point of view - or else they would be using it defensively already. Its either been worked around, or is contributed as SEP (Standards Essential Patent), in which case it can only provide modest income.
Going forward, their most valuable property that would require the least swallowing is probably QNX. All the rest just gives you headaches that none of the Big 3 (MS/Apple/Google) want/need.
If HP hadn't already shot the moon with Palm, they might have been able to make sense with BB. They could keep the government services side running, while trying to re-establish growth in the enterprise. After the Palm fiasco though, I doubt their board would consider any proposal with a straight face. IBM as well might be able to pursue this same strategy, but then they've done pretty good by staying away from pitching user-facing home-grown solutions.
Strangely, I could see Samsung trying to make something of BBM - ported over as a messenger hub into Tizen and even into all their other media devices.
- By hopmedic in forum BlackBerryReplies: 5Last Post: 09-23-2013, 12:33 PM
- By Bfalcon1 in forum Nokia Lumia 1520Replies: 5Last Post: 09-21-2013, 10:02 PM
- By Shishir Girjapurkar in forum Nokia Lumia 520Replies: 4Last Post: 09-21-2013, 01:25 AM
- By hopmedic in forum The "Off Topic" LoungeReplies: 9Last Post: 09-20-2013, 09:49 PM