So Verizon is all about Verizon. And is butthurt because Nokia didn't bow to Big Red. I'm off contract and was going to either Verizon or AT&T. Verizon was first thought because I already have fios for internet and television. But lack of the 920, and things I have read here that have been very informative have changed that. Also I did research yesterday and for LTE in my city, AT&T scored higher than Verizon according to rootmetric's rootscore report. That clinched it.
Though if someone were deciding between the two to switch, I would look up the report for their city. As I have no doubt the results vary from city to city.
It wasn't about bowing to Verizon, it was about going back on what they'd said they'd do. There's a huge difference. Verizon's business model is not built on the phones and they tend to not subsidize phones as heavily as other carriers to get business. A big reason is because they don't need to. A lot of people that end up dissatisfied with their current carriers end up going to Verizon.
The problem here was that there was a deal done. True, it was not signed but it was a handshake deal. From Verizon's perspective, Nokia broke a contract by not honoring their commitment.
Nokia came to Verizon basically begging to be on their network and Verizon listened and liked what they saw.
If Nokia doesn't deliver a high end device to them by early next year, don't expect to see much of Nokia from them in the future. And it'll all be Nokia's fault, not Verizon's. They wanted to expand their lineup.
Granted, I understand Nokia taking AT&T's money considering the kind of shape they're in. And the Nokia was never going to be Verizon's one and only high end device. As we found out today, it appears that the HTC 8X for Verizon has wireless charging as well.
I tend to think you'll see HTC taking the top line with Verizon going forward. A large part of it is that there's already a level of trust built up between the two whereas Nokia has to start out at ground level with Verizon and they didn't do a good job of it.
There are still the promises of giving Verizon an exclusive on the quad-core Lumia in February/March, but the people at VZW are not holding their breath. They'll have the HTC quad core by then too - and HTC is reportedly working on integrating things like OIS into their phones to challenge Nokia and is working with Verizon to build more and better apps.
I think HTC is Verizon's main dance partner for WP8. And I think HTC will end up as the top WP8 seller because they're getting their phones onto pretty much every carrier they can. Nokia may end up being AT&T only on the high end, meaning they'll only ever be a minor player in the US market. There's only so much you can do with one carrier - Apple found that out too. And the Lumia 920 does not have the same ceiling for market saturation as the iPhone does.
Nokia is smart at launch for taking extra cash, but it could hurt them long term if they've alienated other carriers in doing so. T-Mobile wanted the 920 as well. I talked to a salesman in one of their stores recently who said their plan is to push the 8X strong.
I think the 920 is a slightly better phone, depending on what you do, but I think the 8X will end up being the top seller once people get their hands on it.