That is simply not true. Everything works EXACTLY the same way in Windows 8 as it did in Windows 7. If you don't want to use any of the tablet-friendly stuff you never have to, except for the Start Screen, which required no "discoverability" whatsoever (once they put the Start button back in in). e.g. If you didn't know the Charms Bar was there or how to access it, you were no worse off because you could still access all of its features via other, previously established methods, like the System Tray or Control Panel. Or if you didn't know about the app switcher on the left side of the screen, you could still use ALT+Tab like you always did in every other version of every other OS. They didn't take anything at all out, they just added extra stuff that made it work well on tablets.
Windows 8 was a failure because it alienated the desktop experience, so to say it was "EXACTLY" the same as Windows 7 is laughable. Hot corners IMO were a terrible idea. It was implemented solely for the purpose of creating a way to allow a tablet feature to work with a mouse. Hot corners were an annoyance that would often interfere with the "X" button to close an application, accessing the start button or accessing an applications context menu (top left) when using a mouse.
I only bought a Windows tablet about a year ago, I'd been a very happy W8 user for more than two years before that, precisely because they only screwed around with the core desktop experience where it made things better and left 99% of it exactly how it was. Someone coming from W7 to W10 is going to find it far more difficult to get used to than they would if they'd gone to W8 first because a whole heap of things that just worked in W8 now need to be set-up and configured to work in W10. e.g. Continuum is now a thing you have to set up and make decisions about, where it was just a part of W8 that worked when you needed it to, usually without you even realising. To me that is the mark of a good OS - it does what it has to so that you can get things done without ever realising just how hard it is working behind the scenes to deliver a great user experience.
I'd say the statistics support my claim that W7 to W8 was the worst transition possible for the general population of Windows users. If anything, users updating from Windows 7 to Windows 10 will be presented with a more than familiar experience. Start button,
check. Start menu,
check, all app list,
check, no more hidden navigation elements,
check. Continuum doesn't HAVE to be setup, as it works as a feature out of the box. You just have the ability to customize the continuum feature. A feature that a small portion of user will be using, those only with hybrid devices, whereas Windows 8 left your average user clueless about a significant portion of the OS. I've witnessed multiple consumers returning devices and complaining about Windows 8 because they simply couldn't figure it out on non-touch devices.
OK, if W10 makes everything so "discoverable", can you tell me how to visually distinguish an "app" from desktop software? You can't any more, which is a bit of a problem because they use completely different APIs. In fact, the way W10 works almost makes apps a waste of time because there is no reason to use them. e.g. Why would I bother with a weather app on W10 when I have the Bureau of Meteorology website pinned to my Taskbar and Start Menu? It makes sense in W8, because I get this beautifully tailored, full screen experience but there is no place for any of that in W10.
And do you know how long that process took? Around 20 minutes. Everything in W8 made perfect sense from the outset and after a single session I was powering along.
This is a benefit to Windows 10, you shouldn't' be able to tell the difference between a Window Desktop App and a Windows App. People avoided Windows 8 apps like the plague because they were designed only for tablets and tablets only. The new apps work in both modes for touch (tap) and mouse and keyboard UI's. Does an app become handicapped any because you can't tell if it's a Windows Desktop App or Windows App? Windows 8's world of two app's was rather silly IMO. Two calculators, two control panels, two web browsers, etc. just worked against the OS. I know a guy who used the Modern IE browser on a non-touch laptop and couldn't figure out why he had issues with certain websites --- work related sites that require features only available on the desktop IE. The Windows Store will suffer and fail if apps cater to only touch devices. The new purpose of apps and WinRT is to create a world of universal apps that can work on all of your devices and eventually replace most if not all of Win32 as the capabilities of WinRT matures over the years.
Why would you use a weather app in Windows 10? Seriously? A full featured app with live tile, which displays information about the location of your choice versus a web shortcut to a website? That was a pretty terrible example. An app doesn't lose any functionality because its not full screen or the task bar is visible. I can argue that the Bureau of Metrology site is pointless, because well, I can just ask Cortana for the weather.
You mean become accustomed to scrolling through an endless list of app icons in a single column view instead of having them all spread out in front of me on one screen? I can get used to that easily enough, I already am. That's not the issue, though, the issue is that in 5, 10 or 20 years it will still be objectively worse than how All Apps work in W8. Surely, at the end of the day, something is only worth getting used to if it is actually better than what we had before?
While the opinion on W8 vs W10 "All App" view is purely subjective, I personally hated the way Windows 8.0 & 8.1 handled it and even with it over the entire screen you had to scroll, but horizontally. For me it always took longer to find them there. One thing Windows 10 Build 10130 just implemented to make discoverability easier was to add a WP style all apps jump list to simply click or tap a letter and it would jump to that section.
Burying the all apps and power controls underneathe 3 menu buttons (start + hamburger + button) spread out over the screen is technically more discoverable than gestures, but it's also a lot more work to get to for a tablet/mouse user who was able to access these types of controls with one swipe or hot corner gesture. The smart solution would have been to provide the option for both one simple swipe gesture for power users and obvious button controls for new users who are unfamiliar with the gesture shortcuts. The solution is not to force the power users into clicking on tons of little tiny buttons all over the screen and nesting menus inside of menus. Windows 8.1 had solved a lot of these discoverability problems by putting buttons like search and power directly on the start screen. Windows 10 buries these essential functions under an additional hamburger menu on the start menu. How is that moving in the right direction or making things easier to find for users?
The "All Apps" list is buried, another underneath
THREE menu buttons? That's hilarious. Let's see...
Desktop mode: Click "Start", move mouse upward less than one inch, click the "All Apps" icon --- only 2 clicks with minimal mouse movement and you're there in the same amount of time as Windows 7.
Tablet mode: Tap "Start", tap the "All apps" menu icon --- only 2 taps.
It's no more work than Windows 8 tablet mode, you either had to tap start and swipe up or swipe in the charms, tap start then swipe up --- the last method being 3 gestures. Just saying...
Users were forced to do more differently in Windows 8 than any other version. Windows 8.1 solved a few things, but left plenty broken. I'd be willing to bet my next paycheck that a Windows 7 user who has
never touched Windows 8.1 or Windows 10 would find Windows 10 easier to use. They would only spend time learning new features, not re-learning how to do old common tasks as many needed to do with Windows 8.
Some of the design decisions in Windows 10 are simply mind boggling. The automatically hidden title bar placement of a tiny hamburger menu to access app charms can hardly described as more discoverable than the large charms bar on Windows 8. With the removal of the charms functions we are losing critical functionality like print, share, project, & settings, from hundreds of thousands of modern apps. Many new Windows 10 apps no longer support any of this functionality (making the apps nearly worthless IMO) and on the legacy Windows 8 apps the charms functionality is so difficult to enable and obscure that it might as well no longer exist. There's no just "deal with it" here. This is an unusable downgrade from Windows 8. More than just being inferior to Windows 8 and a chore to use, Windows 10 is broken and missing critical functionality. I cannot adapt to something that is not just unpleasant to use but doesn't even work. There are no workarounds for the problems like not being able to print, share, or access settings of a new app or legacy Windows 8 app.
While charms exist in older Windows 8 apps, Microsoft appears to be moving away from it for whatever reason. But for the apps, which still have a charms, the amount of gestures are the same to access it. Instead of a swipe to see charms, you tap or click the charm menu --- top left corner of an app. Still a single gesture, just not a swipe anymore. Unfortunately, they seem to have removed the "Devices' option, which allows for Printing, Projecting and Playing To from any app. So it sucks to see that leave. But we have the Windows Feedback app & Windows.uservoice.com --- make suggestions! I personally feel the swipe in charms menu needs to be removed, but the idea of charms should definitely remain in Windows.