Does it give you a chill knowing that your beloved Windows OS is becoming a joke with all the security holes and backdoors lurking in the wild? Perhaps it's about time to give a try to the free software alternatives(aka linux)?
Does it give you a chill knowing that your beloved Windows OS is becoming a joke with all the security holes and backdoors lurking in the wild? Perhaps it's about time to give a try to the free software alternatives(aka linux)?
True, but with the vast amounts of those affected machines is astonishing. Machines that all of us relies on everyday, hospitals, atm machines, business computers, etc etc. It's scary.lol. The NSA weaponized SMB server exploit was patched as soon as it was released.
The people infected are running outdated unsupported OSes like windows xp.
True, but with the vast amounts of those affected machines is astonishing. Machines that all of us relies on everyday, hospitals, atm machines, business computers, etc etc. It's scary.
This is a really big deal now that we know the computers that are running our lives can be compromised this easily and someone somewhere (NSA) have the ability to take full control without us even knowing.
Unfortunately this whole cyberwar thing is a little unsettling. Whether its the android/ios/Samsung tv CIA leaks, or the windows nSA ones, there seems to be increasing dependency in the modern day on computers and governments are battling to see who can create the most devastating electronic hacks.
With IoT, contactless payment, electronic ID/signatures, location tracking/data mining, cameras....this all only seems to increase in risk.
It seems like the biggest risk to that society, and to our privacy are the tools being developed by the government, particular the US government.
One day, it'll all probably come to a head, and people will be wary of such reliance. Something like an infrastructure hack, or a mass electronic theft.
The worse thing is this kinds of attack always happens only to those devices running closed source non 'Free Software' operating systems that all of us relies on. I've never heard or read anything this bad that happened on Linux as a whole.
Well of course, they target the biggest userbase. If everyone in the world used Linux, you bet your nuts the CIA/NSA/Russian govt and other hackers would be spending their time on that.
Funny they targeted Samsung TVs too. Didn't know they were that popular. Clearly they must be.
That said, there was a big infrastructure hack in China some years back, where they killed a powerstation. Possibly that was running Linux. Infrastructure attacks might well focus there.
It's not about the amount of users but how the developers developed and configured their softwares. If it is about the user base then all of the major servers and mainframes like Google, Facebook, IBM, Amazon, and etc would have been compromised because they all use Linux.
If a user only do basic computing then he should be using Linux instead
Facebook has been hacked a few times, as I understand it. Amazons been hacked with some massive password and credit card detail leaks. Not sure I'd trust amazons security too much given this.
Google has their 'Google Vulnerability Reward Program' where they pay anyone that hacks them. And I'm talking decent pay here - find an exploit and get thousands of dollars. Googles been hacked in the past, or at least there are credible claims, but I think they take patching vulnerabilities incredibly seriously.
Amazon also has its own bug bounty program, even though they have been majorly hacked at least twice.
So its really not a case of Linux can't be hacked, its more that people who run Linux servers are beholden to constantly plug exploits, much like desktop OS makers have to constantly fix exploits.
The problem with desktops, is those people don't update their software, fix the holes - or if the exploit is discovered by the hacker before the security people. Its really more like an arms race. There is no OS in the world which is unhackable.
Most of the hacking is actually done by governments attacking other governments, or corporations or governments spying on citizens or other governments.
Using a desktop Linux platform, is for security purposes like using a sailfish, windows 10 mobile, or bb10 phone - there's no one really using it, so that's going to make you pretty safe.
Linux does have a pretty tight permissions system. that is slightly better than windows though. But it also doesn't sandbox applications, which windows 10 uwp apps do. Android of course users Linux's permission system, but its still possible to get in through the user, via malware or other exploits.
Would I say Linux is more secure? Yeah it probably is, at a basic level. But who's plugging the exploits when it is vulnerable? If it were mass adopted, someone would need to seriously, commercially manage that end.
You are correct and that's why Windows is terrible for basic users, unlike Linux Windows is only being maintained by one company and for that matter no one (except to those who were granted) is able to look and inspect whether there are malicious codes in the system and that's why these catastrophic exploits happens. And by nature, a community driven Open Source OS is far more secure because it's been inspected very well by the public and companies that relies on it to make sure that no foreign codes are lurking and that everyone has agreed before releasing it.
I'm guessing you've never used linux before that's okay tho.Would I say Linux is more secure? Yeah it probably is, at a basic level. But who's plugging the exploits when it is vulnerable? If it were mass adopted, someone would need to seriously, commercially manage that end. I wouldn't trust a free open sourced distribution, if engaged at a massive consumer scale to be secure at all - because every exploit that exists would have to be patched by a centralised software distribution agency, and with some rapid speed.
If Linux had a centralised application store, like windows or osx, running sandboxed applications that have been through some level of basic scrutiny, AND it received centralised security updates, via automatic update - it would undoubtably be the most secure OS there is, very very hard to hack. It already has some strong advantages in terms of security, no doubt. But invulnerable - no, it ain't.
Plus Linux in a way is a sort of legacy OS. It's going to struggle to keep up in the age of machine learning, and VR/AR, multiple devices hybridization and so on. There is SO many coding hours involved in these sort of projects, and because Linux is open source, it tends to lag behind.
Something like Linux mint for example, can't run on a smart phone, can't run in mixed reality. Linux has no smarthome hub, no voice assistant, no machine learning apis. It's hard not to imagine Linux being left behind in what essentially is another arms race- the race between google, Samsung, amazon, sony apple etc for the future.
Certainly if it could become competitive in these future areas - mixed reality, machine learning, voice recognition, hybridization/form conversion, varying input and output methods (voice, stylus, touch, gesture, hologram projection, little screen, no screen), as windows 10 is trying to do. If it could even keep up, it would offer a competitive advantage over the others paid or advertising funded offerings.
But jesus those unpaid open source devs would have to literally work their behinds off for a great many years. I can't see that even being possible without commercialisation. Even then, there's the software gap. You'd have to market it well enough, or have enough of a competitive offering vs the others, that users would switch.
I'm guessing you've never used linux before that's okay tho.
My simple answer to this is that the community behind Linux and Linux distros don't want anything that violates the user's privacy and it's up to those who wants to use Linux as a tool to do whatever they want whether for good or bad things, it's free after all.Your basically plugging democracy right there. I can counter - Donald trump Its not only possible for billions of people to be wrong at once, its probable that the on average opinion is usually wrong.
Seriously though I do believe Linux is a pretty secure system. It's not perfect, it can be hacked.
I just don't see how it can stay modern as a desktop platform, or acquire software developers or a larger userbase. Already both other desktop platforms sandbox applications, apple and MS are both buying AI companies left right and centre. They have marketing, teams developing innovative new features. Linux has taken long enough just to create a simple to use GUI.
Anything along that line of future proofing would require a commercialized IP version. And so far, the makers of such products have been pretty small beans outside of server services.
Have you heard any talks of an open sourced voice assistant, or smart home hub on friendly simple Linux distro? At/VR? Machine learning for content curation, content creation, or recognition?
Is there an open sourced google search? Can hardware be open sourced, so that Linux can develop new hardware models?
Do you believe open source can actually meet the future?
Commerce, as bloody as it can be, and less than ideal, is the way we have of driving people, motivating them, and having them sacrifice for the next thing. It's probably going to get us all nearly killed one day, but a unpaid model just does not seem likely to compete to me. The devs and contributors would have to be driven by something more powerful that the ability to put food on the table, like religion or similar.
My simple answer to this is that the community behind Linux and Linux distros don't want anything that violates the user's privacy and it's up to those who wants to use Linux as a tool to do whatever they want whether for good or bad things, it's free after all.
A little bit. Not recently. I wouldn't dream of using it for my main OS, it has none of the software that I use regularly. Plus, I am pretty clumsy with the commandline, compared to dos/powershell. I like to understand by system, and I can't be arsed learning Linux shell commands.
Are you implying that there's a Linux distro with machine learning in built and VR baked into the system? That there's a Linux smart home centre, that's compatible with smart home things? Sandboxing? Auto-updates? Or that any of those things are somewhere being actively developed?
What did you think I missed?
Auto updates? Yep there are "app stores" auto updating everything. And commands if so you choose
Apps? Like I said there's an app store
Actively being developed? Depends on what you mean
Sandboxing? Not sure, I dont have the knowledge for that yet and since I use non proprietary(Open Source) apps then it's already safe and secure
Machine Learning? : Does it invade your privacy? Yep everything so no machine learning for the mainstream Linux distros or at all.
I use Manjaro KDE, beautiful desktop and the most customisable with almost everything that I need, I blame AdobeWhat Linux do you run out of curiosity?
I might play with some virtualized machines at some point, just for fun.
I played with Linux for a few years a while back. It was fun but every time I tried doing something different I had to spend a few hours learning. It got to a point it was too big a hassle for the casual user so I went back to Windows for the UI and ease of use. Its like everything else. Its nice to have open windows to air out the house and get a slight breeze but you have to remember to close the windows when you leave. If not, you're taking chances.
Twitter: @PhotographyET
Does it give you a chill knowing that your beloved Windows OS is becoming a joke with all the security holes and backdoors lurking in the wild? Perhaps it's about time to give a try to the free software alternatives(aka linux)?