Yesterday evening I used it to create and edit a complex Word document, keeping the email I was transferring info from open in a multitasking window, using a USB mouse alongside the type cover. I later watched something on BBC Iplayer whilst cooking in the kitchen.
Today I've taken it into work to present a Powerpoint presentation via HDMI and I write this in a coffee shop whilst browsing the web. I need to edit a large spreadsheet later, for which I will plug the Surface 2 into my external monitor and use a bluetooth keyboard and USB mouse.
And at no point will I have even thought about turning on my 15.5" full windows laptop.
That's been my experience (over the long haul) as well. The capabilities of the hardware connectivity are truly outstanding and not in question.
In contrast, I had an Ipad for 3 years which got used for watching videos and that's about it.
That is more a reflection of what your use cases are for a tablet rather than any inherent limitation of the iPad. I've owned iPads since day-1 and I've owned keyboards for them since day-1 as well (I bought the keyboard dock). I have always been able to perform productivity tasks, give presentations, and do things that can't easily be done with the Surface 2. (eg. Podcast recording/production)
The Surface does almost everything I could want it to, and the type cover is utterly fantastic (particularly now double-tap to click has been introduced).
The trackpad is terrible. It should be a crime to include that trackpad on a keyboard that cost $130.
Its a shame the Tech press keep lambasting Windows RT for what it doesn't do, completely ignoring the fact that for a huge percentage of people just having Office and a proper browser that supports flash is all they need. Screen size is easily overcome by plugging into an external monitor.
I agree. Some of that has been caused by Microsoft's marketing and positioning.
Conversely, whilst an iOS or android tablet has a plentiful selection of apps, using them to do anything beyond multimedia in my experience is an absolute exercise in frustration. Adding a mouse into a windowed desktop environment that allows proper multitasking adds a completely additional layer of functionality.
It must depend upon what you're looking to do. I've been able to do, from a software perspective, everything that I can do on my Surface 2 and much more and do it more easily on the iPad. Whether it is jotting handwritten notes, drawing diagrams, sketching, blogging, extensive note taking, research, presentation, multimedia creation, I have been able to do it with overall less frustration and less fiddling around on the iPad 4 than on the Surface 2. Where the Surface 2 reigns is in the hardware. I can attach USB devices easily and directly. I've mentioned numerous times here how terrific it is to directly attach my Blue Yeti USB microphone to the Surface 2 have it recognized and usable. The problem is the lack of quality apps to use it.
The only things I'd change would be better web browsing battery life, proper Sonos and Spotify apps and for MFST to stop introducing new bugs every time a new update is released!
"Awesome" is subjective. I would not call a device that needs to be troubleshooted each month because of buggy updates, awesome. I'm still getting 12-14 hours of use out of my year old iPad 4... that's heavy usage w/bluetooth keyboard and network access.
All that to say this... I don't think the Surface 2 (or any device) is a de facto slam dunk for a person. Everyone needs to carefully examine how they use their devices, what they hope to do with them, and determine which one most closely matches.