Sorry dude, but your reviews is really not good.
All your issues that you are mentioning are out of the hands of Microsoft. Plus you complain about Windows 8 in itself... which makes no sense. You bought the device knowing it came with Windows 8.1, and you complain how it's terrible like you knew this in advance. Also, your Windows 8.1 opinion has no purpose in the Surface Pro 2 review.
Finally the simple use of caps locks, doesn't make you right or give you any validate. In fact it does the reverse effect on expression your opinion.
Also, it's Mini-DisplayPort, and it's full size version, is a standard computer display connector, which is already set on a path to replace DVI for it's numerous advantages, and 0 downsides. I don't know what this "micro-DisplayPort" is, and HDMI is not a standard computer display connector. HDMI is for entertainment and it's total junk, and arguably more limited than DVI, which is sad.
Advantages of DisplayPort
-> Support significantly more plug-in and out before port breakage than DVI, making it idea for laptops and tablets.
-> DisplayPort 1.2 supports 4K resolution @ 60Hz @ 8-bit colors per channel (HDMI is stuck at 1080p @ 60Hz @ 8-bit colors per channel, unless you get the brand new HDMI 1.4b, with cables and supported hardware, then you can support 4K @ 24Hz @ 8-bit colors per channel, but you face multitude of issues that can arise, as 1.4b is more of a patch to get 4K out of teh door, than properly support it. HDMI 2.0 is not out yet)
-> DisplayPort carries full monitor information in a standard and clearly defined mater, like DVI. HDMI does not. You need to, most of the time, fight with the graphic card control panel, in trying a multitude of options to get the image display correctly, unless lucky.
-> DisplayPort support 10-bit, 12-bit, 14-bit and even 16-bit color per channel, allowing support for multiple trillion color displays. DVI and HDMI does not. HDMI is limited to 8-bit colors, and DVI can do 10-bit colors but compressed, unless the resolution is low.
-> DisplayPort support 1920x1080 at 144Hz at 8-bit colors, and can do more. DVI requires dual -link DVI, a hacked up version of DVI, where it's 2 DVI put together to acheive such reqiurement for support display. The same hacked up plug is required for anything larger in 1920x1200 in terms of resolution.
-> DisplayPort consumes less power than any display connector on the market, making it great for tablets and laptops
-> DisplayPort has a internal ribbon cable version, for tablets and laptops internal display, which consumes even less power.
-> DisplayPort carries audio, and auxiliary (what ever the hardware manufacture wants, pretty much: like USB, or Ethernet for example) as well as video
-> DisplayPort 1.2 supports daisy chaining multiple display as extended, from 1 plug on the graphic card/device. You can plug up to (if the graphic chip and display supports it): 4x 1920x1200 display @ 60Hz)
-> DisplayPort carries error correcting bits, much like DVI, ensuring the best visual experience at every frame. (HDMI does not)
-> DisplayPort is backward compatible with single-link DVI, HDMI and VGA with any simple, basic, inexpensive adapter. No conversion required.
-> DisplayPort is royalty free, making the implementation of the port, and cables far more cheaper
-> DisplayPort full size, have a latch system connector, to make sure it wont' fall out. And doesn't have a screw system which is annoying to tight in and out.
As you can see, DisplayPort massacre any connectors that is on the market right now, and is why it has been selected. DisplayPort is known and expected features on a business class laptops since 2008. And are finally slowly entering the consumer grade market.
If you want HDMI, get a Sony device or any strong supporters of HDMI (Sony original idea).
Sony wanted DVI, but with encryption system which "will eliminate piracy of movies for ever" (well we can see how that turned up to be false), and the DVI consortium laugh their head off. So Sony formed the HDMI consortium with several companies, and billion dollars later, in great rush for Blu-Ray release: here comes HDMI, a less capable and more problematic connector than DVI (not to mention supports shorter distance). With a wide range of supporters (if you are not supporter, you have to pay ludicrously high royalty fees.. that is how Sony got people on board), and massive Apple-like advertisement campaign to push HDMI, leads to what we have today: Over priced TV's, over priced cables, a ****ty connector that falls off all the time, and the protection system got cracked in no time.
So, how does it make any sense for Microsoft to even include HDMI?