ArmedandDangerous
New member
No, the concept is not similar at all. HTC basically said OK, cameras have been going from 1MP to 3MP to 5MP to 8MP to 13/16MP, let's step back to where we were a few years ago and settle at 4MP.
Nokia started by using a large sensor (4x larger than others) with high resolution to enable a reasonable zooming capability. If zooming or reframing is not required then the pixels are combined to create a cleaner and sharper image.
The approach is fundamentally different and I believe HTC's is sadly fundamentally flawed as many reviews have panned its camera performance. It's not even on par with the iPhones and Galaxies, let alone the 1020 or 1520. They have betted on the false premise that how you slice a cake can make a big difference in image quality while Nokia simply uses a larger cake.
You are intentionally not including further information on HTC's choices to go with the 4MP route. No, the HTC One does not oversample like the Lumia 1020, but it does have bigger photosites which DOES make a very big difference in the amount of light being captured. Almost nothing touches the HTC One in low light, it's the brightly lit areas where the HTC One is most weak at. It has terrible dynamic range with blown highlights and washed out blacks. Two phones good at two different things. The 1020 doesn't hold a candle to the HTC One's low-light performance while the HTC One can only dream of resolving as much detail as the 1020.