sullibr01
New member
so how does that explain the double talk time?
.
I thought I read that CDMA radios are more efficient.
so how does that explain the double talk time?
.
I thought I read that CDMA radios are more efficient.
Right here in the specs:I am still confused on the differences in audio between this and 920. Is there more mics than 920? Are they different? Some people have said stereo recording but I dont see that in specs. Also, I see it has a different speaker but is the amp new and different? What about headphone amp? Regarding camera, is hardware really different besides the xenon flash?
again but that doesn't explain why talk time is so more when both screens would be off.
Actually it does. The voltage level isn't directly tied to the AMOLED being on or off. It's the core operating voltage of the phone, likely rectified/step-down to the voltage of the various components in the phone. The fact that they are using lower voltage means there is less power dissipation on the phone; i.e. less waste heat. I would guess that the CPU and radios are 1) newer die - less power dissipation, 2) more efficient with CDMA. Combine all of these factors and you can quickly see the times going up on everything. The CPU/radios likely being newer dies with less current leakage is probably one of the biggest power savings for standby and actual talk time.
So where are the Lumia 920 'size' apologists? Glad Nokia realized what an overweight brick 920 was. Hoping for an even lighter (less than 150g) Catwalk.
Water-Tight Rabbits. Yeah, that must be what WTR stands for. :wink:
Can you please elaborate more what is Water tight Rabbit ? I try google it, cant find anything relevent. Thanks in advance. N
Dude u forgot ur sarcasm font.