Does this make anyone else feel really awesome owning a windows phone?
Live from CES 2012: Windows Phone $100 Challenge Day 1 Recap - YouTube
Live from CES 2012: Windows Phone $100 Challenge Day 1 Recap - YouTube
One think I am curious about: I watched on video where he searched for a restaurant against a galaxy nexus. The titan beat the nexus, but it was close. Would the results have been different if both phones were on the same network?
Sent from my mwp6985 using Board Express
I think they have to be on the same WiFI network
I'm an idiot! Now I remember reading elsewhere that both phones were using a Microsoft hotspot.
Sent from my mwp6985 using Board Express
Nah. I see what you really did.
You merely asked the question so that people who didn't see the video would be aware that both phones were on equal grounds.
You sneaky guy!
I would have liked to seen some people make the challenges instead of the WP guy making them up. He definetly made challenges based on WP strengths, but I understand its marketing.
I think that sums up my issue with this whole thing - it's a series of rigged tests that yeah, look good as results at a very cursory glance, but ultimately concern functionality where tiny fractions of time won't actually matter to end users and also things don't look as good as soon as you pay a bit more attention.
OK, so WP beat an Android phone in e.g. posting a picture to Twitter by 1.3 seconds - good stuff. Now let's see who can make a Skype call the most quickly. Or who can shoot 1080p video. Or who can even do something as simple as toggle wifi on/off the fastest. Windows Phone would lose the latter and can't even do the former two, and that's why I just don't get on with the braggart style of marketing - it isn't classy, and it absolutely invites people to point out the obvious and then it all starts to backfire.
I think that sums up my issue with this whole thing - it's a series of rigged tests that yeah, look good as results at a very cursory glance, but ultimately concern functionality where tiny fractions of time won't actually matter to end users and also things don't look as good as soon as you pay a bit more attention.
OK, so WP beat an Android phone in e.g. posting a picture to Twitter by 1.3 seconds - good stuff. Now let's see who can make a Skype call the most quickly. Or who can shoot 1080p video. Or who can even do something as simple as toggle wifi on/off the fastest. Windows Phone would lose the latter and can't even do the former two, and that's why I just don't get on with the braggart style of marketing - it isn't classy, and it absolutely invites people to point out the obvious and then it all starts to backfire.
Problem is, it's a bit of fun that gets people wound up because it has so many caveats and is so rigged because the tests are so specifically chosen (there are already youtube videos up about the "rematch" one moaning about how MS cheated). And that means yet more retaliatory WP bashing on tech forum threads, bad mouthing the platform and so on. WP succeeds when people try it and enjoy it for what it is and it cuts through their prejudices, and I can see this sort of "ha ha, in your face! We blew you away!" thing as being a turn off meaning they won't even give it a go (and - no offence to our US chums - it's a VERY Americanised way of selling/advertising something).
The main thing though is that if this is pushed to a full advertising campaign, I GUARANTEE a ton of videos on YouTube showing WP being "smoked" by other phones doing a lot of other things. A bit of fun could end up being quite bad PR.