- Jan 30, 2011
- 1,007
- 6
- 0
I want to seriously discuss this topic and would really like to keep the biased "TMo FTW" or "death to TMo" type statements out of it. It makes sense that two networks merging could in theory, with some optimization of course, perform better than either network could alone. My stance at first was pro T-Mobile independence but I started to realize, after reading some of the points that AT&T was making, T-Mobile won't be able to stand alone without Deutche Telekom's help (I didn't know that they pulled support from T-Mobile USA to focus on their EU companies/networks until I read the public interest article). So what would happen if the deal didn't go through? T-Mobile would stand alone until (given their rate of customer loss) they go out of business in which spectrum would just be sold to the highest bidder in which AT&T would get what they want anyways, except without giving the benefit of special deals that migrating customers may get if the deal does go through, but instead all customers would probably be left to fend for themselves regarding carriers... Which is bad news for me and people like me who want a "top" carrier but are now inconvenienced with the big possibility of having to pay a deposit. I know Sprint wants 200 for deposit from me, Verizon might never take me back because of financial history/issues (not that I want their overpriced service anyways) and when I first got cell phone service I had originally wanted AT&T and the iPhone as I had the money at the time for the phone but no deposit, turns out they wanted 500, I checked recently and its increased to 750. I can care less for the iPhone now but AT&T isn't too shabby around my area. So obviously since AT&T more than likely will end up getting what they want anyways, I think it may as well be now, that way I (and many others like me) can be considered "migrated" and not have to worry about a deposit. So in that aspect I know it would help people, but what are all of you're thoughts on this?