jaj324
Banned
Re: Confirmed LTE may be a battery KILLER! (on unlocked models)
It's the fat mayor's fault...
Nokia 1520
It's the fat mayor's fault...
Nokia 1520
It's the fat mayor's fault...
Nokia 1520
As you said you have a strong LTE signal which is exactly why you don't suffer any battery loss. If you had a weak LTE signal you might see issues.
It's the fat mayor's fault...
Nokia 1520
It might be a third (although related) thing: maybe using a "non-local" LTE phone is a problem. If that's the case, it would mean that people would have a battery problem is they use an RM-937--which has LTE for Europe, Asia, and Oceania--while being in North America or use an RM-940--which has LTE only for North America--while outside of N.A. Those conditions might make the phone "think" that it has bad signal all of the time....it's not LTE that is the battery killer, it's a weak signal that is the battery killer.
As an RM-937 owner living in the US on Straight Talk, I can say i do not experience those battery issues at all. Of course I don't have LTE either so that backs up what the OP experienced with a weak signal LTE draining it.
Yes it does but LTE doesn't work for RM-937 hence "I don't have LTE either". Read the thread and subsequent replies carefully before replying next time.
Because he made this value realization:why are you using a RM-937?? You are in the US and on the at&t network.
And my guess is that that's the decision that most folks will make if they have no existing "investments" in Qi pads and who haven't yet become addicted to the luxurious laziness that Qi recharging brings.I don't need the extra 16GB or wireless charging.
Now I'm afraid to purchase the RM 937. It seems to be about $200-300 cheaper than the RM 938 version.
I'm in the Greater Toronto Area in Ontario. I am with Fido. Should I spend the extra $200-300 just for the 938 version or will 937 be enough?
Also, 937 has 2100 and 2600. It's just missing 1700. Does that mean I'll still have 2100....?