cores vs clock speed vs RAM

[pankaj981]

Also keep in mind the graphics chipset in 920 is powerful than the 635. It's like a comparison between i7+GT620 vs i5+GT580/HD6990. Having a better graphics chip takes off the load from the CPU for graphics processing (playing games, watching videos, animations, etc.). Also, as some have mentioned above, unless the program in written to take advantage of multiple cores, having multiple cores is not much beneficial
Sent from Tapatalk on my Nokia Lumia 925 running WP8.1

 

[bijak_riyandi]

I don't see that. In fact, I don't see the benchmarks in that article revealing anything at all really.

oops, confused that one with this:
Nokia Lumia 1020 Vs Lumia 630, Speed Comparison - YouTube

anyway, thanks for the lengthy information
I understand it more now

 

[euichii]

Let me bookmark this for later reading

 

[a5cent]

oops, confused that one with this:[/url]

anyway, thanks for the lengthy information
I understand it more now

Yup. All those tests that run entirely on the device show that the 1020 is noticeably faster.

Any CPU performance test that involves a lot of communication over WiFi shouldn't be taken seriously however. Devices must take turns communicating with the WiFi router. That makes such tests like a hurdles race, where no more than one runner may be jumping an obstacle at any one time.

 

[bijak_riyandi]

Yup. All those tests that run entirely on the device show that the 1020 is noticeably faster.

Any CPU performance test that involves a lot of communication over WiFi shouldn't be taken seriously however. Devices must take turns communicating with the WiFi router. That makes such tests like a hurdles race, where no more than one runner may be jumping an obstacle at any one time.

yeah, but the app (not the page) actually loaded a split second faster in the 1020
so it's still a win?