captblaze
New member
Perhaps its time MS and Nokia make their devices unbranded for the US market so ATT can get out of the way
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 4
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 4
what if they said next January, would you say, ah well they promised end of January
Perhaps its time MS and Nokia make their devices unbranded for the US market so ATT can get out of the way
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 4
Ye gads.
Current 920 owners fall into two categories: those who are ineligible for upgrade because they haven't even had their phone a full year, and those who bought their phone off-contract and wouldn't buy an on-contract phone anyway. Neither group are prime candidates for 925 sales, so it does AT&T no good to delay 920 updates in the hopes it would drive 920 users to the 925. Or to the 1020, for that matter, for the same reasons.
For this update? No, that would be too much. But September isn't January, and September isn't horrendously late. I'm not going to die, nor is my phone going to spontaneously combust, if I have to wait until September. It's all about perspective; we're talking about an OS update for our smartphones, not the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything. All this gnashing of teeth and cursing AT&T seems a little excessive to me.
Yes true, point taken... But what about the potential first time Windows Phone customer, who doesn't want to shell out all the clams for a 1020, will have the next step down choice of either a 920, with portico for $49, or the newer 925 with the highly publicized "Nokia Amber" for only 50 bucks more (with a 2year service plan of course)?
*sigh*
Idk... I bet as soon as I come up with the balls to flash this thing, then they'll have the update ready lol
Haha yea, that's what I feel too! As soon as I flash it the update will be out the next day. Happens all the time! Ah wellEd Boland said:I bet as soon as I come up with the balls to flash this thing, then they'll have the update ready lol
But what about the potential first time Windows Phone customer, who doesn't want to shell out all the clams for a 1020, will have the next step down choice of either a 920, with portico for $49, or the newer 925 with the highly publicized "Nokia Amber" for only 50 bucks more (with a 2year service plan of course)?
For this update? No, that would be too much. But September isn't January, and September isn't horrendously late. I'm not going to die, nor is my phone going to spontaneously combust, if I have to wait until September. It's all about perspective; we're talking about an OS update for our smartphones, not the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything. All this gnashing of teeth and cursing AT&T seems a little excessive to me.
That's better than I get: "check the news blog for updates!"
Nothing new but here you go:
funny.... "are you calling it a liar?" :devil:
AT&T does not want anything getting in the way when people are deciding whether or not to enter into a new two year contract. That is where their wireless revenue is, all of it. For every 100,000 customers that get a new contract and a 1GB data plan that is $22,800,000 they have for predictable revenue for the next two years.
Updating the 920 now might get in the way of the decision. They started accepting pre-orders yesterday and the phone will be released on Sept 13. If customers dig just a little deeper they will realize the 925 is inferior to the 920, no wireless charging and 16GB of memory with no SD slot. But, it is new so it has to be better.
This is why we wait. I will guess Amber does not show up until at least a few days after the 925 is released.
basically no one is going to start a new contract to go from the 920 to the 925.