KhawarNadeem
New member
- Jul 6, 2014
- 322
- 0
- 0
That's what I mentioned earlier, that Lumia 930 is a great device, but it didn't meet our expectation. It was supposed to be a true successor of 920. They removed glance screen, that is just a minor setback.
But its camera should have been better, where it should have taken pictures as crisp and sharp as IP6 but at 20MP, without oversampling. Its low light images should have been as good as 920 (if not better). I would not call 930 a true successor of 920. Although I love the design of 930, it is the best I've seen in any Lumia smartphone
I like how the 920/925 had huge sensors with the lower 8-ish MP cameras at the time when 13-20MPs were becoming more common. The picture quality was very much ahead of the curve. The 930 has a very large sensor but instead of making it 20MP, they could have kept it around 13 and that would have improved low light performance by A LOT. They were joining the specs war with the 930, and in that they made some glaring errors like some Android phones. Sad.
930 is gorgeous. But the heating, battery life, lack of glance, and bad low light camera are small things that add up.
