lstrike
New member
That could be. But, does that mean the 808 is not BSI?
Correct the 808 does not have a BSI sensor.
That could be. But, does that mean the 808 is not BSI?
Even 920, which is bad on it's own, takes better pictures.
...
I wonder if it had something to do with the departure of Damian Dinning who was a Nokia camera guru? Once he left, their cameras took a serious nose dive.
LOL, just as suspected, 1020 is garbage. Even 920, which is bad on it's own, takes better pictures.
So much grain and noise... Nokia's latest cameras are terrible, I wonder if it had something to do with the departure of Damian Dinning who was a Nokia camera guru? Once he left, their cameras took a serious nose dive.
unternull, thanks for the samples.
Uh, he left after the 920 was released.
Also, unternull's images aren't that great of a representation (no offense intended). The ones that crash1989 had posted on his Skydrive were much more promising, but he's since removed them.
And again, just the presence of grain or noise on its own doesn't necessarily make an image bad.
Uh, he left after the 920 was released.
Also, unternull's images aren't that great of a representation (no offense intended). The ones that crash1989 had posted on his Skydrive were much more promising, but he's since removed them.
And again, just the presence of grain or noise on its own doesn't necessarily make an image bad.
I'm gonna do pictures of low light stuff tonight( think car under street light. Etc)
THe problem is this is a phone. If I am going to go through all the trouble of changing those settings then why don't I just bringa really good point and shoot with me or a dslr in the first place?
The auto settings HAVE TO BE GOOD. that's the whole point. if I change all those settings I will miss the shot with a phone camera. Also the fact that this phone is $100 more on contract then the 920 is a big deal .
.........................
Hardly garbage. Maybe the dumbest comment yetLOL, just as suspected, 1020 is garbage. Even 920, which is bad on it's own, takes better pictures.
So much grain and noise... Nokia's latest cameras are terrible, I wonder if it had something to do with the departure of Damian Dinning who was a Nokia camera guru? Once he left, their cameras took a serious nose dive.
unternull, thanks for the samples.
I agree that for a camera on a phone, the Auto Mode has to be perfect, if I wanted to play with setting for 15min before each shot I would bring a dslr with me. The main point of a phone camera is that you can quickly take it out and shoot whatever is in front of you and move on. Sure the Pro camera settings are a nice bonus if I ever want to take a really great photo and dont have a dslr around, but for the 1020 to appeal to most consumers it has to have flawless Auto Shoot Mode.
I do not wonder any longer that WP and Nokia numbers are not so great in US (laugh) - maybe a sales man get a better commission from S4
Ok, so I own the lumia 920, and am no picture taking guru, but it takes amazing pictures, compared to other high end smart phones. I have (in great anticipation) ordeedr the Lumia 1020. I did this based on the webcast of the unveiling of the lumia 1020, as well as the photos posted by Nokia of what the 1020 shoots. It appears to be bar nun, much better than the 920 at photos. Again I am no photo guru, but a lot determines the way a photo turns out, the number one thing being the person shooting the pics. I myself think its great, and can't wait to take some great photos in Disney World with the new amazing Lumia 1020!!!
I am a guru and let me tell you, 1020 does not take good pictures. Do yourself a favour, cancel the order.
I am a guru and let me tell you, 1020 does not take good pictures. Do yourself a favour, cancel the order.