Hey Everyone, I have been analyzing all of the pictures today, and I found out that yes they are grainy in most cases, BUT if you really look at the object in focus, which I did with several tools and zooming in, it is completely CLEAR, NO GRAIN, NO FLAWS, ITS PERFECT. I think that the algorithm that they used with the 1020 is totally different to the 808 because the pureview "Magic" is non present in the 5MP pictures. They are just very good 5MP pictures. Also, have this pictures been taking with the CAMERA PRO app from Nokia? Could it be that the oversampling only works with the Camera Pro app and not with the regular camera?
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!158&authkey=!AMq7D-XwZvRPW9I Taken With a Lumia 920 ISO 100 No flash Auto assist.
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!157&authkey=!APr2NPgAUFQVZ0I
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!159&authkey=!AGC-zctMX9U1hz8
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!161&authkey=!AOBSS91GDE5Ag5o Taken with 1020 iso 100 no flash auto assist
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!160&authkey=!ABWLsYZ4trGlY5o
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!163&authkey=!AH0vffJ4znExgZI
Fixed links and did some organizing
For those living in a small world who don't acknowledge that anything but Nokia phones exist, 920 comparisons may be good enough. But in the real world, there's a sea of smartphones with better cameras than the 920, and the 1020 needs to be able to trump those slim, sexy, less expensive, and far more powerful smartphones in the camera department to justify its very existence. It's already been established time and time again by mainstream non-Nokia *** kissing phone review sites both large and small that the 920 has one of the weakest daylight capabilities of any smartphone. You can tell an image was taken by the 920 because its blurry and edges are always poorly defined, even at high noon. Saying that you shouldn't introduce Galaxy S4 or iPhone 5 pics to compare is like saying the 1020 is so bad it can't compete directly and instead needs to find an uglier cousin to stand next to. Many of the images do look better than the 920, but my old 8MP Note 2 really spanks the 1020 on sharpness and non-fuzzy detail. Can't imagine how much spanking the 13MP Galaxy S4 will give it, or the new iPhone 5S with 13MP. The only reason why I don't have the S4 right now is because I was waiting out for months in anticipation for the 1020. Talk about a cruel joke. I might as well wait for the LG G2, Sony Honami, and Note 3 before deciding on my next phone.
Why is that you guys cannot wait for another week to make conclusions?. katamari201 - Pls bite your tongue for a week and we will all know if 1020 beats 808 now or few updates later.. Remember 808 was 5 years in making and when it launched, it was fully ready. I am sure Nokia had to release 1020 urgently with so many copy cats showing up.. with different technologies.. so either come out now and sort out software in a few months or just forever be the one who release projects which came out later.
808 is a dead end phone.. no body buys it other than that few crazy guys. 1020 is the present and future. Pple didn't want to buy 808 due to Symbian. They were waiting for 1020.. 808 can be the king which no one bothers.
At this point this thread has become pretty useless to read. Trolls and trashing of every photo these guys kindly put up for us. Time to stop looking at this thread.
Thanks for the photos. I'm just going to wait for my 1020. If its at the very least, better than my 920, I'll be happy. If it just so happens to be the best camera phone available currently, then that'll be even better.
I certainly am more hesitant now, and am glad to have read this thread because I cancelled my pre-order last night from AT&T. The camera was certainly something that was potentially going to lure me away from Android, and possibly still may, but I'll wait on professional reviews and comparisons before an impulse purchase.
Nobody should be dissuaded from purcahsing the 1020 from amatuer photos on an internet forum pre-release, but also remember some professional phone reviewers are clueless about cameras and photography, which was evident from 808 reviews.I'll wait on professional reviews and comparisons before an impulse purchase.
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!158&authkey=!AMq7D-XwZvRPW9I Taken With a Lumia 920 ISO 100 No flash Auto assist.
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!157&authkey=!APr2NPgAUFQVZ0I
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!159&authkey=!AGC-zctMX9U1hz8
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!161&authkey=!AOBSS91GDE5Ag5o Taken with 1020 iso 100 no flash auto assist
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!160&authkey=!ABWLsYZ4trGlY5o
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8AA1260976B1AF43!163&authkey=!AH0vffJ4znExgZI
Fixed links and did some organizing
Quite honestly, I'm glad that you guys are sitting here debating over 20 pages about pictures. If they too grainy to you dont buy the phone.
Can we learn more about this phone besides the camera? This is an AMA.
1. So how is IPS compared to ClearBlack Amoled?
2. How is the glance feature? Does it really drain that much battery if set on?
3. How easy of use is the Nokia Pro App? Has anybody tried taking a Panoramic picture?
4. Battery life? Games with the 2gb Ram is it noticeably smoother?
Let's get some variations in this useful thread instead of bickering over pictures. This is a phone still right? Or are we just talking about a camera here?