I don't understand, Nokia design department is just hiding ugly phones in pretty colors. Look at the 920 in black and tells me how it compares to the competition in looks.
There's not reason for the phone to be that thick, there's not reason for the phone to be that long, there's no reason for huge bezel.
We don't know how good the camera is compared to the ATIV, but if the ATIV one is better then the 920 will be worse than the ATIV in every single way.
Are you saying you don't understand how they can talk smack with that design? Well I guess the fact that they were getting high marks a few months back for the 900 gives them a decent enough amount of cred to do so.
I mean, if people thought it was ugly they wouldn't have raved about it, much less bought it.
Personally, I dig the coloring. Could they have gone thinner? Sure, but only their engineers or accountants know the real reason for why they didn't.
The black one, to me, has a slight con against it because it's the typical black that just about any phone has. I suppose it works for people that like having things blacked out. However, the pro on it is that it still tries to differentiate itself through the texture it gives off by the way the light hits it
Could've gone the gloss route too I suppose, but I think people might have taken it less seriously.