Every time specifications related to possible camera flagships are leaked, there are upset voices pointing out the sensor resolution. Assuming the 1020 successor will be anything like the leaked and cancelled McLaren, we can expect a sensor resolution below 41 MP. The sensor resolution is only a small aspect when discussing the output quality of a camera module though, so I wanted to ask everyone:
What specifications do you hope to see in a possible upcoming camera flagship?
Examples of specifications you may want to highlight:
1) Sensor size
- Diagonal comparison:
- For comparison:
- For example: Zeiss lenses, Leica lenses, modular lenses, dual modules or light-field optics.
4) Technical solutions
- For example OIS, Xenon flash, oversampling, optical zooming, exchangeable lenses, 3D imaging, phase detection. Or upcoming technology like InVisage QuantumFilm, CorePhotonics dual-array camera, etc.
I know we all want the Hubble Space Telescope attached to a phone no thicker than a sheet of atoms, but let's try to keep it realistic.
(Funnily enough, the Hubble Space Telescope UVIS CCD is effectively a 44.7 mm? 16 MP sensor. The optics on the other hand are absolutely insane.)
What specifications do you hope to see in a possible upcoming camera flagship?
Examples of specifications you may want to highlight:
1) Sensor size
- Diagonal comparison:
- Apple iPhone 6: 6 mm (1/3") (Smartphone)
[*]Nokia Lumia 1020: 11 mm (1/1.5") (Smartphone)
[*]Nokia PureView 808: 13.33 mm (1/1.2") (Smartphone)
[*]Panasonic Lumix CM1: 15.86 mm (1") (Smartphone)
[*]Sony RX100 III: 15.86 mm (1") (Compact camera)
[*]Canon EOS 5D: 43.1 mm (35mm full-size) (System camera)
- For comparison:
- Apple iPhone 6: 8 MP (1.5 μm pixels)
[*]Nokia Lumia 1020: 41 MP (1.12 μm pixels)
[*]Nokia PureView 808: 41 MP (1.4 μm pixels)
[*]Panasonic Lumix CM1: 20.9 MP (2.4 μm pixels)
[*]Sony RX100 MkIII: 20.2 MP (2.4 μm pixels)
[*]Canon EOS 5D: 23.4 MP (6.22 μm pixels)
- For example: Zeiss lenses, Leica lenses, modular lenses, dual modules or light-field optics.
4) Technical solutions
- For example OIS, Xenon flash, oversampling, optical zooming, exchangeable lenses, 3D imaging, phase detection. Or upcoming technology like InVisage QuantumFilm, CorePhotonics dual-array camera, etc.
I know we all want the Hubble Space Telescope attached to a phone no thicker than a sheet of atoms, but let's try to keep it realistic.
(Funnily enough, the Hubble Space Telescope UVIS CCD is effectively a 44.7 mm? 16 MP sensor. The optics on the other hand are absolutely insane.)