Interesting the 1320 is actually cheaper than the 925.
Lumia 1320 $382.95 USD vs Lumia 925 $407.95 USD
CTINYC - Your unlocked one stop shop
Lumia 1320 $382.95 USD vs Lumia 925 $407.95 USD
CTINYC - Your unlocked one stop shop
925 still has a SoC with a more powerful GPU. Adreno 225 is more powerful than Adreno 305.
Wpbench - first you have to remember that it has an on screen GPU test, so the lower the res - the higher the score. Too bad Engadget didn't breakdown the score and only showed the final score. From those scores I have a suspicion (also based on Basemark's memory scores) that the Lumia 1320 might have higher binned RAM included which always helps in synthetics. Maybe in this SoC Adreno 305 isn't as crippled with slow RAM as with lower-end Snapdragons. Though Basemark's GPU benchmark contradicts these scores - Lumia 1320 doesn't score 300 points and 920/925/1020 score about 330 points. But that's how it always goes with synthetics, each of them tests differently. The only definitive tests are games. Anyway, there must be a reason why before S600 and S800, Qualcomm put Adreno 225 in the more expensive SoCs. This performance question is still up for debate ;]So this isn't actually true. Check out the Engadget Review posted above. The 1320 SOC is almost as fast as the 1520. Completely kills the 925/1020 in wpbench, antutu, and sunspider. Amazing...didn't expect it
