Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella claims OpenAI had two years of runway in the AI race to work uncontested and build ChatGPT

[Windows Central]

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella recently indicated OpenAI had a 2-year lead to work uncontested in the AI race, leading to its immense success with ChatGPT.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella claims OpenAI had two years of runway in the AI race to work uncontested and build ChatGPT : Read more

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

Specifically, I would really like it if Microsoft could provide instructions on how to:

1) How do I grant a permission to another person to open and read an encrypted document I sent via Microsoft Outlook (one of the countless versions of Outlook)?
There is no option for that obviously necessary function!

2) How do I obtain a permission to open and read an encrypted document, sent via some version of Microsoft Outlook, to me as the intended recipient?
No option for that necessary function!

So far, I received no response, Is there anyone who knows the secret handshake on this?

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

It is surely intriguing how any post here is denied, merely on account of length.

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

That is, the more details one provides on a problem, the more likely it is to be refused as "scam" or "illegal".
I thought, to myself, that the more you know, the better the decision. But that is not part of the WindowsCentral
algorithm.

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

So far, Microsoft remains silent on this issue. It is astonishing enough that any of my questions to Microsoft Sales, regarding: "How much more do I have to pay, beyond Microsoft 365 subscription, for Outlook Encryption/Decryption to work as flawlessly as it does for P r o t o n m a i l .com?" have provided Zero responses.

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

In a way, MSFT's advertising that Outlook can send encrypted documents safely to another recipient, APPEARS TO BE FALSE, according to my repeatable experience. (You know, come over to my place, and watch how it DOES NOT WORK in real time, over and over, time and again!) My experience is not wrong, it just feels totally wrong.

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

I conclude that algorithms are not that smart, and can be defeated by feeding info in small, spoonful pieces.

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

And, well I'll be back. Hoping for actionable information!

 

[Rhubarbed WireSloth]

As far as AI goes, Mr Nadella, you absolutely do not understand the human part of it. AI, as it appears now, has no
reasoning skill, no conceptual understanding, no ability to look at consequences for humanity at large, no ability to
look at context, to consider narrow or wide focus, none of the factors that makes us, relatively, human.

And you know what we call people who act without regard to consequences: INHUMANE!