JudgeHolden
New member
- Apr 26, 2011
- 221
- 0
- 0
How could it not be? The rumor that we as sales reps are required/encouraged/forced to offer one phone over another is so ridiculous. Anyone with any kind of sense can imagine the illegalities of doing so, and the conflict of interest claims that would come up.
We have a marketing department, and the marketing is a joint effort between our company and the manufacturer of the phone.
It's actually not ridiculous. I find it odd that you think it would be. Various companies give various commissions based on products they want to move all the time.
But if you read the post on the main page of the site I defended your claims that it isn't what's in the works here. Instead it's three factors: Carriers aren't attempting to educate associates, associates have their own biases as we all do and try to sell accordingly, and Microsoft is the Oldsmobile of the technology industry.
Pulling any one of these levers will influence the rest, I might add.
But look, everyone: wireless vet is one of the few Verizon associates interested enough to show up to this board and, if you look at his history, he's still ambivalent about WP7, still thinks we're nuts and, if we were to walk into his store, would still show us Android and iPhone before WP7. Of course he would! For one, we're far more likely to be interested in those devices, meaning it's an easier sale. For another, they're the devices he knows best and he's most interested in and therefore can speak the most about.
But if we came in and said we wanted WP7 I'm sure he'd show it to us. I'm sure he'd also offer to show us something else, but that also makes sense.