Amazing edits man!, you are proving wrong the guy who started a thread to complain about the 930's camera!
Tomorrow I will probably put some test video... I did already one continual 14-minutes shot, and I am really afraid that OIS during video shooting is doing terrible job.
What I don't understand is, if you take a look at this comparision
Nokia Lumia 930 vs. Nokia Lumia 925 - GSMArena.com
Lumia 930's sensor size is 1/1.25 while 925's sensor size is 1/1.30 (smaller than 930) and still 925 produces low light images as good as Lumia 920.
So why can't 930 and 1520 produce better low light images than 925 or atleast as good as 920?
f2.4 (930,1520) vs f2.0 (920,925) It is very big difference how much light sensors can collect in certain amount of time. 920 and 925 have also bigger individual pixels which doesn't generate so much noise compared to 930 and 1520.
But you can take equally good low light shot whit 930 and 1520. You just need to use manual settings since auto settings use so high ISO values due f2.4 lens, that noise levels are so high which destroys details from photos. OIS is much better in 1520 and 930 which compensates higher f-value allowing longer exposure times wo blurring. That doesn't help with moving objects though.
I'm yet to see how Nokia cyan update improves low light shots. If manual settings are used, 930 should trump 925/920.
The reason they reduced the size of sensors, was to compensate the thickness. 925 is thinnner than 930 and still it has bigger lense than 930.
In Nokia Camera, the max loseless zoom in photos for 4:3 ratio is 1.9x and 16:9 is 1.7x. You can zoom in much more with the Default Camera app and ProShot but there will be a loss of quality.
Thx. i havent known that. Do you know if the same applies for Videos ? i mean is the max zoom in Nokia Camera there also lossless ?