- Dec 14, 2012
- 890
- 0
- 0
Never used one and never will. It amounts to supporting a useless industry contributing pollutants to the environment to solve a problem that does not exist. As far as greasy fingers smearing the screen:
1) Anyone ever hear of those things called napkins? They have been around for awhile and work wonders when it comes to pizza and other food.
2) If one chooses to not use such things, you are still smearing your screen, just via a PET, urethane, or polymer film.
3) Glass is easier to clean and not subject to chemical destabilization/breakdown.
It is also worth pointing out that any (meaning every) screen protector creates resistance for which the active stylus was not designed. As such, it is reducing the use life of the nib at the very least and requiring the user to exert more pressure on both the screen and pen body. Sorry but this is one where people are buying into marketing claims. There are some lines of work where protectors are merited but for the vast majority of users, you are simply spending money on a value-less add on.
At first when I read this days ago I was in complete disagreement. After trying two screen protectors (the second being Mr. Screen Protector) I think I'm with you. Any screen protector... any will affect the writing with the pen and what's the point of using this awesome device if you can't use the damn pen?! I've been without screen protector for weeks and just clean with iKlear spray and cloth regularly.
The only other thing to try is the new Zagg glass. I've tried the regular Zagg as already noted and it's garbage but not the "glass" version. It's expensive as hell but may be the way to go if I can stomach the cost. Has anybody tried the new Zagg Glass yet?