Spec Comparison: Samsung Ativ S vs Nokia Lumia 920

[saintforlife]

Ativ S vs Lumia 920:

Processor:
1.5 GHz Dual Core vs 1.5 GHz Dual Core - Draw

RAM:
1GB vs 1GB - Draw

Screen Size:
4.8" vs 4.5" - Ativ S

Screen Resolution (ppi):
306 ppi vs 332 ppi - Lumia 920

Screen Quality:
HD Super AMOLED vs PureMotion HD+ - Lumia 920

Thickness:
8.7 mm vs 10.7 mm - Ativ S

Weight:
135 gms vs 185 gms - Ativ S

Battery:
2300 mAh vs 2000 mAh - Ativ S

Memory:
16/32 GB (with micro SD expandable) vs 32 GB - Ativ S

Camera:
8 MP vs 8.7 MP PureView - Lumia 920

Can we call it a draw between these Super Phones in terms of specifications?

The Lumia 920 has an ever so slight edge overall due to its exclusive apps, software, camera technology and looks. The Samsung Ativ S wins in the portability, screen size, battery life and storage departments.

People can't go wrong with either of these phones. Both are amazing devices in their own right IMHO.

Discuss...

 

[Reflexx]

They're both great handsets.

It will end up depending what a particular person's priority is in their smartphone.

A person preferring a light phone with expandable memory will get the Samsung.

A person who wants a nicer screen and camera will get the Nokia.

Choices are great to have.

 

[blehblehbleh]

Choices are great to have.

Heheh not when there are on such opposite sides of the spectrum. It kills me that the 920 doesn't have a removable card slot or large standard battery capacity.

I hope someone puts in a nice middle ground within the next 6 months.

 

[jimski]

Good comparison, except for the size and weight, which are subjective. Those two areas are informative, but you can't declare a winner, unless you are simply stating your personal opinion. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Sent from my Lumia 900 using Board Express Pro