Well, I've reread this review thoroughly, and this ...
A legitimate criticism of Nokia?s 808 PureView camera is that while it can take amazing shots, it really requires the hands of a very knowledgeable user to pull them off. That same complaint applies to the Lumia 920?s camera as well. To most eyes, the images look a little washed out and don?t "pop," with not enough warm tones. A studied pro might say that they?re more accurate and true to life, but the vast majority of smartphone users don?t want to think about the nuances of optical imaging stabilization, they just want to take photos.
... made me realise that I really can't take that review seriously. So, a camera that takes photos with realistic colouring is now a disadvantage? If you take a picture in the middle of a sunny day, where everything seems to be whiter and cooler, the colours on the picture are supposed to look as if you have taken the picture in the late afternoon (when the colours look warmer and richer)? They've got to be kidding.
This though ...
Taking three shots of the same scene can sometimes produce as many as three different color temperatures: a beige coffee table appeared rosy in one image, a greenish yellow in the next, and the perfect pale taupe in the third.
is, IMHO, more of a problem. I had a similar issue on my Lumia 800: When I tried, for example, took a macro picture of a pure white object, the colour tended to have a rosy tint ... I solved this by swichting to "snow" when taking pictures, which resulted in pure white objects in the pictures. After some update during summer (I believe), the white balance became much better in automatic mode.
Still would like to try such scenarios out myself rather than just trusting a review.