^ No. There is no secret batch, nor would it necessarily be amazing if there was.
When it comes to determining what the fastest CPU configuration is (number of cores, threads, etc) at any given power and thermal budget, the engineers at Intel are likely more knowledgeable than any of us here. If their top of the line 15W part is a dual core configuration, those of you wanting four cores at 15W would definitely end up with an inferior solution. Intel's quad core parts start at 45W, which gets us double the cores (and only occasionally better performance but never double), at the cost of tripling the power budget. If that's amazing, it's at least not unconditionally so.
Assuming we stick to the 15W CPU power envelope, the quad core system some of you want would make the device slower in most scenarios, because each core would be forced to run slower than in could in the dual core setup. If we went the opposite way and increased the 15W power envelope so as to accommodate the more powerful CPU, we'd end up with a thicker, louder and heavier device due to requiring a beefier cooling solution, not to mention suffering noticeably worse battery life. If you don't want those power and thermal restrictions, choose a bigger and thicker laptop, like the SurfaceBook, or just buy a desktop where you can go all out.
Anyway, those of us willing to step back and forget the marketing driven desire for more cores will recognize that the Surface Pro 4 is in fact the best performing device ever built at this particular size/form factor. If you want the best performing device at this size, then this is what you get. End of story. In that sense, how many cores it has is completely irrelevant.