what about PureView

wamsille

Banned
Aug 30, 2012
544
0
0
Visit site
Ask yourself this question:

Would you rather have a phone with a camera branded PureView, which could be crap or would you rather have a fantastic camera?

You could put a Porchse logo on a Chevy Cavalier but it's still going to be a Cavalier.
 

wpp8fan

New member
Jul 15, 2013
20
0
0
Visit site
Ask yourself this question:

Would you rather have a phone with a camera branded PureView, which could be crap or would you rather have a fantastic camera?

You could put a Porchse logo on a Chevy Cavalier but it's still going to be a Cavalier.

so the pureview technology for nokia or for microsoft :unhappysweat:
 

another visitor

New member
Aug 15, 2013
17
0
0
Visit site
The people who made PureView are going to MS, and they are licensing the tech too. It's pretty obvious that future generations of the Lumia (or whatever they call it) will have that level of imaging. It's the tech and people who made it that matters.
 

vlad0

New member
Oct 9, 2012
1,069
0
0
Visit site
The name doesn't matter.. there is a ring of about 50 patents surrounding the PureView systems, and that's the important part. As long as Microsoft have access to those, you are good..

Hopefully Microsoft can retain the imaging staff on their payroll..
 

Similar threads

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
322,485
Messages
2,242,092
Members
427,939
Latest member
michaehap